Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my (our?) communication
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Mon, 31 August 2009 22:04 UTC
Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 601FE28C258 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.339
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.091,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id piiTDs6aWIDm for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:04:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep11-int.chello.at (viefep11-int.chello.at [62.179.121.31])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB993A6C69 for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep11-int.chello.at
(InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id
<20090831220410.MHSV793.viefep11-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz>;
Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:04:10 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge
id bA451c01b0FlQed04A460j; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:04:10 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
<carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MiF06-0008AK-7A; Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:05:22 +0200
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 00:05:22 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090831220522.GA29965@alinoe.com>
References: <20090831170006.GB15637@alinoe.com>
<382d73da0908311034u50baa09fqcdbed2a478df99f8@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <382d73da0908311034u50baa09fqcdbed2a478df99f8@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my (our?) communication
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:04:01 -0000
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 01:34:50PM -0400, Kari Lippert wrote: > Personally I would drop the use of "LAND" and "ADJACENT REGIONS" but > I think these terms, as defined here are the right set based on the > lengthy conversations I started yesterday morning. Using these terms > it should now be rather trivial to restate the Charter in a way that > captures the essence of the effort's intent. > > Kari thanks and since Infinity didn't give replacement terms in his reply (he only said 'this term is not defined by us in past 2 years') I see no other alternative than to use these terms. > On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Carlo Wood<carlo@alinoe.com> wrote: > > A) A smallest partition > > > > REGION > > > > B) A collection of adjacent regions run by a single administration > > > > ISLAND or ADJACENT REGIONS > > > > C) A collection of adjacent regions's run by different administrations > > (which very likely use the same TOS etc) > > > > LAND, or CONTINENT when larger. > > > > D) A collection of continent's that are not adjacent but still fall > > under the same TOS, likely use the same inter-world protocols > > and organisation-specific extensions etc (likely, they will > > have their own website and their own Abuse Report team etc). > > > > VIRTUAL WORLD > > > > E) A collection of Virtual World's that have totally different > > administrations and possibly different TOS etc, but which > > interoperate (ie, you can pass on a Landmark of one VW to > > a person you meet in another VW). > > > > GALAXY > > > > F) The whole of all Galaxies that do not interoperate, but still use VWRAP. > > > > VWRAP UNIVERSE > > > > G) The rest that use the term "virtual world", but do not use VWRAP. > > > > MMOX UNIVERSE > > > > > > Please state if > > * you have problem with me going to use these terms consistently in my posts > > * you will use these terms with the same meaning > > * you wish to give these terms a different meaning > > > > I understand there is also something called "REGION DOMAIN", but > > I have no idea which of the above that would be as it's not my > > term and it was never discussed. > > > > -- > > Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> > > _______________________________________________ > > ogpx mailing list > > ogpx@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx > > -- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
- [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my (our… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] Definitions of terms to be used in my … Dave CROCKER