IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on Teleports and protocol resilience)

Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CDF28B797 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.32
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.32 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wy1P9ivtNxXH for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:56:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bw0-f223.google.com (mail-bw0-f223.google.com [209.85.218.223]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588753A68A5 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:56:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by bwz23 with SMTP id 23so3483552bwz.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:56:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DQErnJWS2ZQZb4/UqVN6IIoXpxiXHz8ezde3XyV6rVA=; b=PST8th+Vsxd20JBuCqmAsYBdBW144Xges6fCz90rnkBs+ja5jppoo2GcyaifOCBB4N nlAVqArohiugwzTOs1UW6Ux5vvGTA+ihyRvsp+PXGnZADFSRzRudDgjacyshnmDwKs8k NSsZqsuF4s1leCRnfbkoWY0IcS5BHy5TBZtiE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=xZjujS5hi08KP0+3i15+R5tD+msoz51BHN51XGNKBDqLSbZ43pPr9iDf/LGgSH2qpD y1WB4QRYYHRxQuhaJ/ulihcN0gh9fkFBPwNNdqXmyQRXvN7xerX0BB98peNEar23LNCD qxD5BelcsnrR5+k5PqLOL0JP3rQf/Z40+HHXQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.154.69 with SMTP id n5mr1073449bkw.43.1256903774953; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:56:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20091029130303.GA2298@alinoe.com>
References: <20091028120323.GA9827@alinoe.com> <20091029130303.GA2298@alinoe.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:56:14 +0100
Message-ID: <9b8a8de40910300456s62ff44ana481e676af6e2a72@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cfbca05e015047725b7a0
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on Teleports and protocol resilience)
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:56:04 -0000

Nothing wrong with your writing, it is just hard to discuss *anything*
without underlaying documents. What we need are new versions of the drafts.

-Vaughn

On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > If we expect messages that update state to be lost, then there
> > two several ways to recover:
>
> Excuse my English :p ... Obviously I meant "then there two ways..."
>
> While I value Vaughn's responses highly, I was hoping on
> eactions to my posts from others as well... Is it my English,
> making me look like a noob maybe? Or is it too trivial/technical?
>
> --
> Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email