[ogpx] resolving the name issue
Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com> Fri, 21 August 2009 18:29 UTC
Return-Path: <infinity@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 580553A6AE0 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.096,
BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FTaT-zU5kA8x for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f175.google.com (mail-px0-f175.google.com
[209.85.216.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538663A6B92 for
<ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so4309572pxi.6 for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.142.9.31 with SMTP id 31mr92386wfi.96.1250879381155;
Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 11:29:41 -0700
Message-ID: <3a880e2c0908211129l7d9defa5od81261e3e5805714@mail.gmail.com>
From: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [ogpx] resolving the name issue
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:29:38 -0000
it seems to me we're in the enviable position of having several good name suggestions: ARAP, VWIP, OVER, ABOVE and VWGP. We also have the historical name OGP. would it make sense to go around asking people to rank their name preferences and do Single Transferrable Vote (STV) to find the first, second and third most popular choices? -cheers -meadhbh
- [ogpx] resolving the name issue Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Bill Windwalker
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Barry Leiba
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Kari Lippert
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Meadhbh Siobhan
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue Barry Leiba