Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status

hey josh.

intro and llsd have received a lot of input, so over the next three
week's i'm going to be pushing out a new LLSD draft incorporating that
feedback, so we can get a new round of discussions going before we
have to have it finished. we're merging parts of david's deployment
patterns draft into the intro draft. it also will be out soonish for
comment. i'll work on an overview of what's changing on both documents
for monday morning.

-cheers
-meadhbh

On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 15:42, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> wrote:
> Now that we have consensus to bludgeon the policy conversation further only
> in private email for a while, how about a quick status check?
>
> Meetings:
>
> The next IETF meeting, IETF76, is coming up in a little under a month. In
> discussion among the co-chairs, area directors, and current slate of draft
> authors, we didn't feel that there were enough outstanding issues requiring
> a face-to-face meeting this soon after chartering the group. Given that
> other WGs needed time on the schedule, we've opted not to have a WG meeting
> this time. We expect to have plenty of issues that will benefit from
> face-to-face meetings (with mixed-reality components!) for the next several
> sessions.
>
> Should any issues arise which require broad working group input and cannot
> be resolved on the mailing list prior to the next session,
> http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html provide guidance on
> structuring such meetings. Again, at this point, the mailing list (and
> off-list pair-wise conversations) appear to be working sufficiently.
>
> Drafts:
>
> The charter calls out the goal of having the LLSD ('Abstract Type System for
> the Transmission of Dynamic Structured Data' - draft-hamrick-llsd-00) and
> Intro ('Introduction and Goals' - draft-hamrick-ogp-intro-00) drafts
> finished up and submitted by February 2010.
>
> Could the author of those drafts (that'd be you, Meadhbh) and the authors of
> other drafts referenced in the charter (Meadhbh/Infinity, David/Zha,
> Mark/Zero) comment for the group on the status of those drafts, what parts
> are under active work, when the next revisions should be expected, and what
> feedback and inputs are desired from group members at this time?
>
> Are any additional drafts being considered at this time by group members?
>
> Note that if anyone submits a new (-00) draft that they hope to have adopted
> by the working group, they should name it "draft-MYNAME-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF".
> That makes the tracking tools work better.  The WG tools page
> (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/) will show them as related drafts, and
> if/when they become "draft-ietf-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF", the tools will
> understand that the WG version replaces the individual one.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joshua (w/ input from Barry)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>