Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision

Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com> Sun, 30 August 2009 12:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9738B3A6C79 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZTsolk0Ug1VF for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f207.google.com (mail-ew0-f207.google.com [209.85.219.207]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB19C3A6A44 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy3 with SMTP id 3so1591048ewy.42 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EuY/lqcnfV3NcZhoy5oFdQVLxYH5ZZTQ4G+ukH3ycNI=; b=YlzqtNAF+BlDEN5N8TxTDrKQF8Z9DsfyXKfGYYpZupBkl985ZLHiJX0FRDNa/SzZeS budN0MUinaOzsZxnZ+Mu735K6O+gaWS8kbgb2sLj19/chZ+GBni4eT/Ur5ZE/85rarXb u5rCcvL7AdfLsEtfngmq8D2Xz59+DCtlJxf3o=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=O5pfgVfSctFhNRn8OxU2882WVNF7E/0XpUG/j6xjr1859C+TXHyKnGAAjadqBgXEfM PZA1Jdf2w2iaDezHcJmG+bFc1Lx12FbB7n6kIESbLfcRx8VEraPrEXnOSF1VdFN1QltZ ggNco4cYHhjxpSf1ZeDRTAAzTNwDEZGj46aug=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.55.201 with SMTP id k51mr802523wec.184.1251637086088; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:58:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090830123526.GG22756@alinoe.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908281127h6965f332na493007b032e5e93@mail.gmail.com> <20090830003055.GD22756@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908291754x31f24ea7x702100d6aa9810ef@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908300225l34ec9f35x465d46f34313b60c@mail.gmail.com> <382d73da0908300505t3f804865h629bec91ad59954a@mail.gmail.com> <20090830123526.GG22756@alinoe.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:58:05 -0400
Message-ID: <382d73da0908300558x41a09e84h165f50ef459c87fe@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:58:03 -0000

> I think it will make the end-document a lot more clear if we are
> allowed to give examples that include how policy may be implemented
> using the protocol, even though the protocol itself will have no
> notion of policies at all.

Absolutely, I agree. However, I don't think this needs to be stated in
the charter.

(That makes 4 cents... I'm almost at my daily limit!)

Kari