[ogpx] Fwd: VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

[Vaughn Deluca <[e-mail]>]

Argg, again forgot the list...

---------- Forwarded message ----------

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Carlo Wood <[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:10:13AM -0700, Joshua Bell wrote:
> > Without diving in too deep, I believe this thread is putting up a
> two-level
> > false dichotomy - either the RD determines policy or the AD determines
> policy,
> > OR things aren't sensible w/o nil trust. If that's a mis-reading, my
> apologies.
> >
> > IMHO, it should be apparent that both AD (which is the agent/advocate for
> the
> > user) and RD (where the user wants to be) both need to make policy
> decisions.
>
> I'd formulate this as: It is the destination (the region (domain) that the
> user
> is in) that determines the ToS. This is something else than the RD making
> protocol-level policy decisions. The link between RD and ToS is in most
> cases
> not really a technical one (it will only require to use the current region
> to get relevant arguments for some messages).
>
> Its not clear to me what you mean Carlo. How does
"the RD making protocol-level policy decisions" differ from
"It is the destination (the region (domain) that the user is in) that
determines the ToS."

Asume the RD is mature, and therefore states in its terms of service that
any agent present should be above 18.
An agent domain without age verification will be happy to TP its agents to
that RD
The RD will want to inform the AD its not going to happen.  In this example
I fail to see the destinction you mention above.

Vaughn