Re: [ogpx] A Review of Multi-Domain Use Cases [Was: Re: OpenID and OGP : beginning the discussion ...]

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Mon, 29 June 2009 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B7528C255 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.288
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.142, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ebqJFRqP6xfJ for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep20-int.chello.at [62.179.121.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676B53A6B3A for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge05.upc.biz ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090629141752.FRHK21978.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge05.upc.biz>; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:17:52 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge05.upc.biz with edge id 9qHe1c0930FlQed05qHgRQ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:17:52 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MLHg5-0003C9-LC; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:17:49 +0200
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:17:49 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Christian Scholz <cs@comlounge.net>
Message-ID: <20090629141749.GA11830@alinoe.com>
References: <3a880e2c0906280906i2cdcdaa3m3c1b1ef54e4e5fcb@mail.gmail.com> <20090629105140.GA1053@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220906290413u5a7358eao300c2ff8ee1ab709@mail.gmail.com> <20090629114512.GC1053@alinoe.com> <1246283091.4197.69.camel@mdickson-laptop> <4A48C9E6.6080705@comlounge.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4A48C9E6.6080705@comlounge.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>, Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>, "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] A Review of Multi-Domain Use Cases [Was: Re: OpenID and OGP : beginning the discussion ...]
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:17:43 -0000

That is a good idea.

My user editable 'postfix' in the tag is just a means to quickly
keep two friends apart, and get noted of a possible impersonation.

However, if the Real ID (tm) has any external significance as
you proposed, then it would make sense to show that in the profile.

On the other hand - if at some point you can only get into a
virtual world with some globally accepted and legally valid
ID that everyone got (that might be another 50 years, lol)
then I'd not be happy if that was sent to the viewer of everyone
that I run into. You have to keep the possibility open for
remaining relatively annonymous.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 03:04:22PM +0100, Christian Scholz wrote:
> I would also go further and say that it would be great to reuse
> identities on non-3D social networks. As we see with OpenID this usually
> is done via URLs (like myspace.com/mrtopf and now also
> facebook.com/mrtopf) and I don't see why this shouldn't be used here as
> well.
> firstname/lastname should be provided as well of course (e.g. via
> reading it over an OpenSocial REST API) but the real identity is then
> defined via the URL. I am not sure where to display it though, if
> directly over an avatar or inside the profile page but that needs some
> experimentation I guess. At least some means need to be given to find
> out which person it actually is.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>