[ogpx] Fwd: Uncaught bounce notification

Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com> Fri, 25 September 2009 01:11 UTC

Return-Path: <infinity@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA553A6912 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.883
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.883 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.094, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g1irMofRahYb for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:11:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f188.google.com (mail-yw0-f188.google.com []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FAE3A6A49 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ywh26 with SMTP id 26so439419ywh.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with SMTP id 9mr1208430ybb.58.1253841148185; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2594.1253840911.4735.ogpx@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.2594.1253840911.4735.ogpx@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:12:28 -0700
Message-ID: <3a880e2c0909241812x3684219cw61bbce137848a9cc@mail.gmail.com>
From: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [ogpx] Fwd: Uncaught bounce notification
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 01:11:23 -0000

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>;
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>;
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:09:35 -0700
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update

hmm... carlo... for a second i was thinking you were saying "let's
never do another f2f meeting again. let's do everything virtually!"

but that's not what you're saying, right?

i can totally get behind the statement, "in addition to f2f meetings,
we should also have meetings in the virtual world."

further, i think they should rotate between different grid operators:
linden, OSGrid, etc. i mean, this _is_ an interoperability spec.

i believe the IETF has the requirement that only people who have
asserted they have read and understood the IPR policy / Note Well
notice are supposed to be at "official" IETF meetings. in SL, we would
create a group, then make group membership dependent on confirming
you've read the notewell and then limit parcel access to members only.
i haven't ever tried to do that with opensim, but i'm guessing the
capability is there.


On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>; wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:38:40PM -0400, David W Levine wrote:
>> As yet, none of the virtual meeting spaces or tools fully capture the
>> simple power of people sharing a whiteboard in a physical room. The
>> fluidity of interaction (especially in terms of casual diagram scribbling)
>> is a seriously challenging use case.
> Agreed, but also that can be done online. In fact, I already do (did)
> that online with friends sometimes that I meet in-world on SL in parallel
> of "meeting" on a website with a whiteboard (were everyone can draw arbitrary
> multi-color things in some white rectangle).
> On other occassions I've had discussions involving complex mathematical
> formula's, where yet another website was used that allows people to
> "draw" formulas (paste LaTeX)...
> One would think that at this day and age the technology does exist,
> and since it's certainly a LOT cheaper it amazes me that there aren't
> complete packages to allow online meetings with all the benefits of
> a real life meeting. I can't imagine that such a package would cost
> more than a trip to Hirosima, and it would be a one-time purchase.
> --
> Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>;
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx