Re: [ogpx] verbiage : domain, agent domain, region domain, trust domain, service, etc.

James Hughes <jamesh@bluewallgroup.com> Mon, 29 March 2010 18:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jamesh@bluewallgroup.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD7F3A6B27 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.575
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.110, BAYES_50=0.001, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p0T3Ehx8FyXQ for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:15:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com [67.222.54.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C41D73A6823 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 11:14:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20246 invoked by uid 0); 29 Mar 2010 18:15:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO host302.hostmonster.com) (74.220.215.102) by cpoproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 29 Mar 2010 18:15:23 -0000
Received: from adsl-074-237-137-028.sip.gsp.bellsouth.net ([74.237.137.28] helo=ascent.bluewallgroup.com) by host302.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <jamesh@bluewallgroup.com>) id 1NwJUh-0005ki-3c; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 12:15:23 -0600
Received: from [192.168.2.1] (unknown [192.168.2.1]) by ascent.bluewallgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6076F1A7A8; Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:15:21 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BB0EEAB.9010602@bluewallgroup.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:17:15 -0400
From: James Hughes <jamesh@bluewallgroup.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091130 SUSE/3.0.0-1.1.1 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Meadhbh Hamrick <ohmeadhbh@gmail.com>
References: <b325928b1003291016i5c07e6d9na0feda9faf930aeb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b325928b1003291016i5c07e6d9na0feda9faf930aeb@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {2904:host302.hostmonster.com:bluewall:sonabytes.com} {sentby:smtp auth 74.237.137.28 authed with bluewall@sonabytes.com}
Cc: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] verbiage : domain, agent domain, region domain, trust domain, service, etc.
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:15:18 -0000

On 03/29/2010 01:16 PM, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
...
> 1. there's a high quality implementation of an asset service out there
> (cable beach) which _could_ be deployed independently of an OpenSim or
> LL instance. does this mean we should have an "asset domain"?
>
>   
It would make sense to me to have that capability. The 3rd party asset
services will need to provide functions to interact with both agent and
region domains according to subscription rules and agreements entered
into by operating entities and users. Depending on the rule-set, maybe
the avatar can or cannot see particular inventory items on certain
grids. Or, perhaps, region domains will need to negotiate the ability to
rez or distribute objects based on the rule-sets applied at the 3rd
party service.

It seems pretty complex to administrate with a 3rd party. And, in my
opinion, defining an asset domain to operate in would be useful. Just my
OS$2.

regards
James  (BlueWall)