IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] Tourist use case

Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net> Fri, 16 October 2009 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <lenglish5@cox.net>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554503A69B0 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:38:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qtJIRgiJ8yUs for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (fed1rmmtao106.cox.net [68.230.241.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFE03A6405 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20091016233827.YVJR21192.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:38:27 -0400
Received: from ip72-200-121-127.tc.ph.cox.net ([72.200.121.127]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id tbeT1c00S2l1Ksg04beU4x; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 19:38:28 -0400
X-VR-Score: -100.00
X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=Wajolswj7cQA:10 a=LjVozOZdUFbmcqBJa84A:9 a=qNCyov4X387CfwzB1Yd5sLX5WiYA:4
X-CM-Score: 0.00
Message-ID: <4AD903F3.6080809@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:38:27 -0700
From: Lawson English <lenglish5@cox.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Meadhbh Hamrick <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
References: <9b8a8de40910160034j11dcb94fm401f29814aed60a8@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910160500o272f2976ldeae866912deba1a@mail.gmail.com> <b8ef0a220910160644ga1a9486r35bc94eda3a811e4@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b8ef0a220910160644ga1a9486r35bc94eda3a811e4@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Tourist use case
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lenglish5@cox.net
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 23:38:24 -0000

Meadhbh Hamrick wrote:
> but didn't we say that we were going to focus on "second life-like"
> worlds in this WG? isn't that why it was formed? shouldn't the tourist
> model be an effort of the MMOX group? i thought that was the reason we
> kept the MMOX mailing list up, so work could continue on that type of
> virtual world.
>
> -meadhbh/infinity
>   

It seems to me that the MOST touristy mode we will ever see is the 
free-for-all from the original OGP test where
simple TP and naught else was supported.

Will all worlds be willing to support that one? Obviously not (e.g 
firewalled corporate site), but I think many will, including LL on the PG
section of its main grid.


Lawson

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email