IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sun, 30 August 2009 12:34 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E00D28C0EB for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:34:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.34
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kqzxxSJg+3-z for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep20-int.chello.at [62.179.121.40]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96653A694C for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:34:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090830123414.UGCE11480.viefep20-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:34:14 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge02.upc.biz with edge id acaD1c0380FlQed02caEA8; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:34:14 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1Mhjd0-0007Jr-Fe; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:35:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:35:26 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Kari Lippert <kari.lippert@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090830123526.GG22756@alinoe.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908281127h6965f332na493007b032e5e93@mail.gmail.com> <20090830003055.GD22756@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908291754x31f24ea7x702100d6aa9810ef@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908300225l34ec9f35x465d46f34313b60c@mail.gmail.com> <382d73da0908300505t3f804865h629bec91ad59954a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <382d73da0908300505t3f804865h629bec91ad59954a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:34:11 -0000

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:05:32AM -0400, Kari Lippert wrote:
> Morgaine - agree to remove sentence that begins "To support the
> exegesis  of the specifications..."

That was added to allow to avoid confusion that did arise here
about the difference between policy and protocol.

I think it will make the end-document a lot more clear if we are
allowed to give examples that include how policy may be implemented
using the protocol, even though the protocol itself will have no
notion of policies at all.

[...]
> the standard will come. So I ask, what is the focus (purpose) of the
> working group? Why are you making all this effort? Is it to bring the
> multitudes of virtual worlds to one protocol or to make transfer
> between them possible? I posit those are two different standards and
> only the latter is worth standardization.

+1

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email