IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] The Role of Policy and Processing Expectations in Protocol Development

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sun, 23 August 2009 12:23 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A6228C129 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.721, BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fBgoO36o+5MW for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep19-int.chello.at (viefep19-int.chello.at [62.179.121.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5124C28C10A for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 05:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge03.upc.biz ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep19-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090823122334.CYOF21098.viefep19-int.chello.at@edge03.upc.biz> for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:23:34 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge03.upc.biz with edge id XoPZ1c00J0FlQed03oPaWo; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:23:34 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MfC7W-0007wr-9r for ogpx@ietf.org; Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:24:26 +0200
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:24:26 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20090823122426.GA30427@alinoe.com>
References: <20090822.232107.7540.0@webmail09.vgs.untd.com> <20090823121939.GA28003@alinoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090823121939.GA28003@alinoe.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Subject: Re: [ogpx] The Role of Policy and Processing Expectations in Protocol Development
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:23:31 -0000

On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:19:39PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 03:21:07AM +0000, dyerbrookme@juno.com wrote:
> > I didn't say all worlds "have to adopt" SL's c/m/t.
> 
> /me notes that Prokofy uses the word "World" to have the same meaning as Morgaine and me:
> regions running under a different administration, but still reachable by "teleport" in theory.

which follows from the next paragraph:

> > I said they had to *respect* c/m/t or
> > the items shouldn't *lawfully* leave the SL grid. Very simple proposition. There is no
> > reason why the simple regime of c/m/t can't be accommodated and respected, and not just
> > with notecards.

> I can imagine that if some world (not the use of the word) refuses to sign a legal

...
I can imagine that if some world (NOTE the use of the word) refuses to sign a legal
...

damn typos.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email