IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Thu, 20 August 2009 23:56 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF9828C10C for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.387
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.387 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zLIISN+98xcd for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [62.179.121.38]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A7328C12E for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge01.upc.biz ([192.168.13.236]) by viefep18-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090820235613.XXRK25702.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge01.upc.biz>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:56:13 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge01.upc.biz with edge id WnwB1c04G0FlQed01nwCYw; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:56:13 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MeHV3-0006IH-SP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:56:57 +0200
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 01:56:57 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20090820235657.GB21280@alinoe.com>
References: <e0b04bba0908191914h4837045ct777d2c63a30ddaf0@mail.gmail.com> <3a880e2c0908191925p506de284w5ebb5cab7d893256@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908192003p34a367f2q4b99be3cf916cd72@mail.gmail.com> <20090820141835.GB28751@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908201101g3b448d8ck7b406fc481c56f8d@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908201342hd17ce91qac0136124cd3a444@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908201426m6b8feac9v57e9ef1cd73e5c06@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908201600y46311454la8db52c4be1b18dc@mail.gmail.com> <b8ef0a220908201609m1c77be2n3d499b7da20fec5a@mail.gmail.com> <20090820235051.GA21280@alinoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090820235051.GA21280@alinoe.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:56:10 -0000

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> As a result, an agent domain shouldn't care less where someone
> wants to go, because they are never responsible, and therefore
> it should NOT be a matter of policy where someone can or cannot
> teleport while keeping their inventory: it should simply be
> possible, because the address is given in the LandMark.

What I guess is my main point, is that I think that we can
keep using "virtual world" (or just world in short) and
that that should refer to a (group of) region(s) under
one administration, and not to the agent domain; where
the world can (therefore) have a different TOS, has
world-wide bans issued by said administration, deals with
every Abuse Report against avatars in their region,
and which even could run on machines in a country with
different laws than the worlds of other administrations.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email