Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Tue, 06 October 2009 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA97E28C18A for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.224, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0E6tixrRhlW7 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:37:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep15-int.chello.at (viefep15-int.chello.at [62.179.121.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF27A28C171 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 04:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep15-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20091006113839.WTOB17988.viefep15-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz>; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:38:39 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge02.upc.biz with edge id pPed1c03e0FlQed02Pee5R; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:38:39 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1Mv8OY-000242-G7; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:39:54 +0200
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:39:54 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>
Message-ID: <20091006113954.GD32650@alinoe.com>
References: <e0b04bba0909291751g157d2043g1c15e8d8ac417ccf@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0909300910t23131532i1719d2c86423fa41@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011434i13f890bfodd22cd15eef17697@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011457o5e757135rd9db7fc7f4a1389@mail.gmail.com> <OFBDE64925.B257B8B0-ON85257642.007957C9-85257642.007B2CA5@us.ibm.com> <20091002012335.GB690@alinoe.com> <20091005182505.GA20468@alinoe.com> <3a880e2c0910051131k2d81531au275782c6cb3c3655@mail.gmail.com> <20091005223242.GA32650@alinoe.com> <3a880e2c0910051601q7761b380w5985442899ec45aa@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3a880e2c0910051601q7761b380w5985442899ec45aa@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:37:08 -0000

On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 04:01:03PM -0700, Infinity Linden wrote:
> protocol, but leave this as a POLICY for the deployers. personally, i
> have NO PROBLEM with an agent domain and a region domain making
> asymmetric agreements. that is, if region domain X wants to make
> policy A with agent domain Y, but wants to make a different policy
> (call it policy B) with agent domain Z, well good on 'em. i guess i'm
> too much of libertarian at heart to have a protocol demand that each
> participant or pair of participants use exactly the same protocol.

and that isn't a problem, as long as the AD policy is ONLY used to
decide if a user is let in or not.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>