IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Fri, 02 October 2009 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD553A695A for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.250, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Wx2sIRlmfE8 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at (viefep13-int.chello.at [62.179.121.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EF13A6922 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep13-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20091002005022.TKWN28202.viefep13-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz>; Fri, 2 Oct 2009 02:50:22 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge id ncqL1c0680FlQed04cqMmH; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:50:22 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MtWMl-0001wd-9O; Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:51:23 +0200
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:51:23 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
Message-ID: <20091002005123.GA690@alinoe.com>
References: <20090904195822.GA15341@alinoe.com> <e0b04bba0909132243r10730a3fq275f8143087807c6@mail.gmail.com> <20090914084420.GA25580@alinoe.com> <9b8a8de40909291316i19c79a96h111d88e73a64cc79@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0909291751g157d2043g1c15e8d8ac417ccf@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0909300910t23131532i1719d2c86423fa41@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011434i13f890bfodd22cd15eef17697@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011457o5e757135rd9db7fc7f4a1389@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011613w6f25b684w1b0f2e8c7187b3de@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011632n3488ff6aqbf93edbda2a51637@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f72742de0910011632n3488ff6aqbf93edbda2a51637@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:49:16 -0000

On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 04:32:11PM -0700, Joshua Bell wrote:
> Here's the crux of the issue: in our model, the provider of W2 is offering two
> sets of services, AD2 and RD2. There may be a policy covering W2 in general,
> which would affect the AD2 and RD2 services. However, if an agent "from" W1,
> meaning the agent services are provided by AD1, attempts to visit RD2, then AD2
> does *not* come into play. The protocol describes the negotiation between the
> client, AD1 and RD2 *only*.

Good :). Actually, I considered this to be trivial.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email