IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] revised draft charter for OGPX working group

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 06 July 2009 22:58 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23DA3A6DC1 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rChbz+LPjKfR for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:58:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D155D3A6CD0 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1276911fgg.18 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:58:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uhJtnhQpl0Nb9YadCAhBWsbjfvS1psKYXAF8zN4m3nY=; b=K8y0E8gV14wCRkwvVdTfu0nOHCCIgTNFIDSJaa+lu9b0idV48AOUnOEEh1eu6YfzDk ZCOp18jX3vlurmV91uX8JsjHtiQ73rBhXky0lGb1y01Yd5DQ/VLs5fgHvvlC4wVuMBiP XeEGl2i1t+NObjJVjjwvxmTExaW10JCg9J4Tw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=rJUHuGYw18YTVdTsYamXkRV8BNhZL1NDGeAcv0tm34QdNkHXyg2NMX1//VHzlJS/Yt PPHernujVxhy7XMePDZxGVOxnL1bHMC5ZAgDIEzqwSrcmdYqjZN4To0rg7xH4/EMp9rt BMlpHngFeHB41NALGgm5TMmKHZnrkhx7vUab4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com
Received: by 10.239.137.69 with SMTP id k5mr436275hbk.111.1246920629113; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:50:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <b8ef0a220907061419q2f0bcd83wcf818b3b280f7ab5@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3a880e2c0907061116r670f8d19t75afd7f4ab733ae1@mail.gmail.com> <4A525917.6090007@dcrocker.net> <b8ef0a220907061419q2f0bcd83wcf818b3b280f7ab5@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:50:29 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ae5b0f477559f578
Message-ID: <6c9fcc2a0907061550t435c7552wbc24bcf0d874e792@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: [ogpx] revised draft charter for OGPX working group
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:58:40 -0000

> personally, i think we're pretty clear about the value add and i would
> prefer to not have to say "OGPX is not about things that didn't get
> done in MMOX."
>
> but, if you're unclear after reading the draft charter and the intro
> and requirements draft, chances are other people would be as well.
>
> what verbiage would you recommend to make it more clear that OGPX is not MMOX?

Indeed; what Meadhbh said.  As one of the BOF chairs, I'll say that
I'm happy with the charter now, after some side-bashing we had (the
chairs and the ADs).  The dates for the work items are unrealistic,
but we'll sort them out when we're at the stage of finalizing the
charter.

So at this point, if you have a better understanding of the goals and
have specific text to suggest, that'd be wonderful.  Though, please,
not "verbiage"[1]; concise wording that's to the point would be best.

Barry Leiba, ODPX BOF co-chair


[1] "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think
it means. " -- Inigo Montoya

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email