Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update

David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com> Thu, 24 September 2009 23:41 UTC

Return-Path: <dwl@us.ibm.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125F63A6A0E; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.693
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.693 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.905, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S5dtuJTdp6ch; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:41:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com (e1.ny.us.ibm.com [32.97.182.141]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2AC3A6A0B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:41:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n8ONfeh2021938; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:41:40 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n8ONgZ4c250306; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:42:35 -0400
Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n8ONgZYR013955; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:42:35 -0400
Received: from d01ml605.pok.ibm.com (d01ml605.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.91]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n8ONgZG1013952; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:42:35 -0400
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0909241612q1f6dcd4chb2e561a7b1873d26@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9fcc2a0909221330u41bc9ca5u98dca58e01378e41@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a0909241215n7c1efc02rf81484f9bef7491@mail.gmail.com> <702343.73134.qm@web59105.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <382d73da0909241317y703bbeeaucd91e687d0d028f9@mail.gmail.com> <20090924225806.GA8798@alinoe.com> <6c9fcc2a0909241612q1f6dcd4chb2e561a7b1873d26@mail.gmail.com>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 62392787:EC5F01BF-8525763B:0081E50C; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.0.2 HF623 January 16, 2009
Message-ID: <OF62392787.EC5F01BF-ON8525763B.0081E50C-8525763B.00823D17@us.ibm.com>
From: David W Levine <dwl@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:42:35 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D01ML605/01/M/IBM(Build V851_07072009|July 07, 2009) at 09/24/2009 19:42:34, Serialize complete at 09/24/2009 19:42:34
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00823D178525763B_="
Cc: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:41:29 -0000

In terms of the original question. 

If there is sufficient real work to be advanced, I can be at Hiroshima. 
Given
the expense and sunk time, I'd be looking for real documents to present
and discuss, and some reason to think that we'd actually have folks from
the Asia/Pacific region who were wiling to invest time in reading what's
in the document pile and offering serious feedback and discussion. 

- David / Zha 




ogpx-bounces@ietf.org wrote on 09/24/2009 07:12:03 PM:

> Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> 
> Sent by: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org
> 
> 09/24/2009 07:12 PM
> 
> Please respond to
> barryleiba@computer.org
> 
> To
> 
> ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
> 
> cc
> 
> Subject
> 
> Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update
> 
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
> > But, apart from that I cannot afford to (and also not for other 
reasons)
> > participate in real life meetings (outside my city and/or starting 
before
> > 1 pm); I don't understand why this can't be done online... only 
knowledge
> > and data needs to be exchanged. Why is a real life meeting necessary?
> 
> To be clear:
> IETF process specifies that official work is done on the mailing list,
> and so anything that's "decided" at a face-to-face meeting, on a
> conference call, or over any other means (IM or VW, for example) must
> be re-confirmed on the mailing list.
> 
> It is NOT necessary for anyone to travel to the meetings in order to
> participate.
> 
> That said, the IETF holds three face-to-face meetings each year (and
> some working groups hold interim working-group meetings; I doubt this
> group will do that).  These meetings allow for a great deal of
> high-bandwidth interaction and discussion, and usually enable us to
> get a lot of work done that would be more difficult or more protracted
> without the opportunity to get people into a room together.  We find
> that people get a lot out of attending in person.
> 
> Assuming it's chartered, the VRAP working group WILL be meeting at the
> face-to-face IETF meetings -- at least at most of them.  The question
> is whether we should try to meet in Hiroshima, given how soon it is.
> But I'll repeat: whether or not we meet in Hiroshima, and whether or
> not you (meaning any participant) attend ANY of the face-to-face
> meetings, have no effect on your participation in the working group.
> You become a full participant merely by participating here, on the
> mailing list.
> 
> Barry (long-time IETF participant, working-group chair, and former IAB 
member)
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx