IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] Teleports and protocol resilience

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Tue, 13 October 2009 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B448D28C15C for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.582
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.582 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.095, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q-YSjIQnUkQF for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f204.google.com (mail-pz0-f204.google.com [209.85.222.204]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072A828C0E1 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pzk42 with SMTP id 42so3323355pzk.31 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.141.34.9 with SMTP id m9mr922134rvj.84.1255457538970; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9b8a8de40910131031u3c4822eeo665021057514177a@mail.gmail.com>
References: <e0b04bba0910122213n66886b92x57446ad84def466f@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910130853y2e14a37bkef366f7ddcbf1f63@mail.gmail.com> <9b8a8de40910131031u3c4822eeo665021057514177a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:12:18 -0700
Message-ID: <f72742de0910131112l71d7bdc7y9bd7ba094c6c7fcd@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd29bd4a4149a0475d4fcd7
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Teleports and protocol resilience
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:12:20 -0000

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> @Joshua
> RD is not the same as Region, in the TP drafs its the Region(service) that
> has the interface.
>
>
Oops - you're right, of course. Everything we're talking about on this
thread can occur within a single RD or between two RDs. I was sloppily using
"RD" as shorthand for "collection of services that implement region
behavior" but in this case we need to be more precise.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email