Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on Teleports and protocol resilience)
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Thu, 29 October 2009 13:03 UTC
Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id CC61E3A69BD for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.828
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.828 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.312,
BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7ZPcz5iyNOa6 for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:03:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [62.179.121.38])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA883A67EC for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 06:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep18-int.chello.at
(InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id
<20091029130324.MOYY10721.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz> for
<ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:24 +0100
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge02.upc.biz with edge
id yd3P1c01n0FlQed02d3Qia; Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:24 +0100
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
<carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1N3Ued-0000d1-8w for ogpx@ietf.org;
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:03 +0100
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:03:03 +0100
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20091029130303.GA2298@alinoe.com>
References: <20091028120323.GA9827@alinoe.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091028120323.GA9827@alinoe.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Subject: Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on
Teleports and protocol resilience)
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:03:12 -0000
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote: > If we expect messages that update state to be lost, then there > two several ways to recover: Excuse my English :p ... Obviously I meant "then there two ways..." While I value Vaughn's responses highly, I was hoping on eactions to my posts from others as well... Is it my English, making me look like a noob maybe? Or is it too trivial/technical? -- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
- [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was:… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Meadhbh Hamrick