IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision

Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com> Thu, 20 August 2009 22:59 UTC

Return-Path: <josh@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379E73A6DA1 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.402, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S70dBU2+4MPL for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f188.google.com (mail-yw0-f188.google.com [209.85.211.188]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218E83A6916 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-f188.google.com with SMTP id 26so346448ywh.5 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.180.16 with SMTP id c16mr346520agf.15.1250809183832; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <f72742de0908201129l68b070f5s13fa4b0d291362f7@mail.gmail.com>
References: <f72742de0908191206m2a5b3e2fm4efcf0eaf471a758@mail.gmail.com> <20090820140733.GA28751@alinoe.com> <f72742de0908201125k34443566tfaf2894167d7bbdf@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908201129l68b070f5s13fa4b0d291362f7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:59:43 -0700
Message-ID: <f72742de0908201559l107b266ar939e579bee8025b9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016362848ee158bf604719ab584
Subject: Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:59:39 -0000

Re-reading my post, let me clarify something:

* We haven't been explicit about a definition of "world" or "worlds"
and how that maps to regions and administrative domains, and I do not
think we need to. Even stronger, I think doing so would have negative
consequences.

* We should be explicit in the charter that we're talking about
protocol use that may span administrative domains. If that isn't clear
enough, we should update the charter text. Suggestions welcome.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email