Re: [ogpx] one virtual world, or many?

[Kari Lippert <[e-mail]>]

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Meadhbh
Siobhan<[e-mail]> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kari Lippert<[e-mail]> wrote:
>> The network/internet analogy is great. I vote base hit.... and would
>> like to emphasize that, given current usage of the words, the answer
>> to
>>
>>>     Are we connecting two virtual worlds or is the result a single
>>>     virtual world?
>>
>> is yes, sort of.
>>
>> As I understand it, VWRAP is designed to connect/allow
>> interoperability between two or more independent/distinct/individual
>> virtual environments/regions/worlds into what appears to the user as a
>> single environment/region/world/universe. This single
>> environment/region/world/universe is in fact multiple
>> independent/distinct/individual virtual environments/regions/worlds
>> whose boundaries could be administrative or technological but the
>> distinction matters not.
>>
>> Is that right?
>>
>> Kari
>>
>
> this is an interesting use case, but not what OGPX/VWRAP was proposed
> to address.
>
> MMOX remains as a venue for the discussion of integrating technically
> diverse virtual worlds.
>
>

So OGPX/VWRAP is being proposed to address the problem of the
integration of non-technically diverse virtual worlds all implementing
the same protocol?

Perhaps I should interact with the MMOX group. Since I thought I was,
can you point me in their direction? Thanks!

Kari