Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue

"Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)" <mike.dickson@hp.com> Fri, 28 August 2009 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <mike.dickson@hp.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D523A682E for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSWqs61Tq2uZ for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g1t0028.austin.hp.com (g1t0028.austin.hp.com [15.216.28.35]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BC43A6A67 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:20:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G3W0631.americas.hpqcorp.net (g3w0631.americas.hpqcorp.net [16.233.59.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g1t0028.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9D21C62A; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G4W0659.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.234.40.187) by G3W0631.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.233.59.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.375.2; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:22 +0000
Received: from GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.32.148]) by G4W0659.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.40.187]) with mapi; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:22 +0000
From: "Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)" <mike.dickson@hp.com>
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>, "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:19:10 +0000
Thread-Topic: [ogpx] resolving the name issue
Thread-Index: AcooCNisSwX4M2TYTsOMxlwJORIWXgAAxRbA
Message-ID: <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD6FE8098411@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <3a880e2c0908211129l7d9defa5od81261e3e5805714@mail.gmail.com> <479011.65903.qm@web111210.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <f72742de0908270926o6991317cw8d140a7f371e7245@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908280416w60e9c7cdre7e3eaef3e244cb1@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908280848q62e21c54q2b2b2bc72b33f891@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908281056q373b1dd4gf36a9e24cf3d8bfc@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0908281056q373b1dd4gf36a9e24cf3d8bfc@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD6FE8098411GVW0433EXBame_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:20:35 -0000

+1 to move the discussion forward.  I don't love it but its fine as a working name.

From: ogpx-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ogpx-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Morgaine
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 12:56 PM
To: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue


On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com<mailto:josh@lindenlab.com>> wrote:

Can list participants agree to VWRAP as "not perfect, but good enough" and move past the name issue to real interop work?

I vote +1 for this to move us ahead.

The group name doesn't matter too much, and even if a de facto name sticks, it's still got the Region/Agent part to it which is very appropriate and distinguishes it from other protocols.


Morgaine.