Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Sat, 10 October 2009 12:46 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95723A68AB for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:46:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.537
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.537 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nD3ipdZqqHIt for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8FB3A6838 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 05:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [92.40.228.213] (92.40.228.213.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.228.213]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <StCCigBfG3pi@rufus.isode.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:48:15 +0100
Message-ID: <4AD0827A.2090009@isode.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:47:54 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
References: <f72742de0910091542i2e8eda06x9b88cfbcc382e0b6@mail.gmail.com> <4ACFC2F4.3040105@isode.com> <4ACFEBA8.6010508@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <4ACFEBA8.6010508@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:46:30 -0000

Dave CROCKER wrote:

> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
>>> Note that if anyone submits a new (-00) draft that they hope to have 
>>> adopted by the working group, they should name it 
>>> "draft-MYNAME-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF".  That makes the tracking tools 
>>> work better.  The WG tools page (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/) 
>>> will show them as related drafts, and if/when they become 
>>> "draft-ietf-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF",
>>> the tools will understand that the WG version replaces the 
>>> individual one.
>>
>> A small comment on "tool will understand that ...": I don't think 
>> this happens automatically. But the Secretariat can mark a WG draft 
>> as replacing
>> an individual one.
>
> The times I've been part of bringing a private draft into a working 
> group, it
> required submitting a new draft under the 
> draft-ietf-<wg-name>-<draft-name>
> label -- even if the text is identical with the the pre-working group 
> version.

Correct.
I just realized that this might not be obvious to somebody new to IETF, 
so thank you for pointing this out.

> (I don't know about the Secretariat marking step that Alexey 
> references, but I believe it is in addition to, and after, the 
> submission step I'm citing.)

Yes.