IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

"Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)" <mike.dickson@hp.com> Sun, 04 October 2009 16:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mike.dickson@hp.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBE13A6407 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.474
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.474 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.124, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYvcmjjyB0TO for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com [15.192.0.43]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29393A687B for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 09:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from G6W0641.americas.hpqcorp.net (g6w0641.atlanta.hp.com [16.230.34.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by g5t0006.atlanta.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103F2C0D4; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from G3W0058.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.232.1.3) by G6W0641.americas.hpqcorp.net (16.230.34.77) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:08:09 +0000
Received: from GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.234.32.148]) by G3W0058.americas.hpqcorp.net ([16.232.1.3]) with mapi; Sun, 4 Oct 2009 16:08:09 +0000
From: "Dickson, Mike (ISS Software)" <mike.dickson@hp.com>
To: Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:07:29 +0000
Thread-Topic: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01
Thread-Index: AcpE5Nypx3BAH61hQEKWjVt6gLf6SQAJ51AQ
Message-ID: <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD771A0D8277@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net>
References: <e0b04bba0909291751g157d2043g1c15e8d8ac417ccf@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910011613w6f25b684w1b0f2e8c7187b3de@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0910011632n3488ff6aqbf93edbda2a51637@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0910012252v540dd170k4b81e30052e6c974@mail.gmail.com> <3a880e2c0910020932t5995c477qb0d798de1c2653f6@mail.gmail.com> <20091003192159.GA7474@alinoe.com> <e0b04bba0910031452o2a497effi57c4e92f8902b5df@mail.gmail.com> <20091003222118.GA16290@alinoe.com> <e0b04bba0910031633k2127d996v5ef5d3f356623a69@mail.gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD771A0D8236@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <9b8a8de40910040421y41314922o4c5242c77941af4c@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9b8a8de40910040421y41314922o4c5242c77941af4c@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD771A0D8277GVW0433EXBame_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ogpx@ietf.org" <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:07:37 -0000

I think SMTP is a very good example. An SMTP server  will reject mail from untrusted sources; if I try to use the SMTP server in Domain X while logged in at domain Y it normally fails, because the SMTP server does not trust anybody but those it has information on (that might include age, real world address etc.), i.e. users  from X.

The age restriction is not carried explicitly in the protocol, but is coded in the source of the message. Its actually the trust relation between the SMTP server and that domain were the user is logged in that determines the SMTP protocol response.

In my view this is fully analogous to the way VWRAP should deal with age restrictions or whatever other constrain.

-Vaughn

You've expressed this more concisely than me. Yes, I completely agree and that was the point I was making.  Not to code the policy in the exchange but to allow the exchange of information such that a policy decision can be made.

Mike

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email