IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sat, 22 August 2009 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86333A6845 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.397
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.397 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BL2hKxLIgVqz for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [62.179.121.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883473A69B5 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge05.upc.biz ([192.168.13.212]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090822012449.DJDJ6129.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge05.upc.biz>; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:24:49 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge05.upc.biz with edge id XDQm1c04C0FlQed05DQoi1; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:24:49 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MefMO-0008Ae-4j; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:25:36 +0200
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:25:36 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Joshua Bell <josh@lindenlab.com>
Message-ID: <20090822012536.GB29557@alinoe.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908191925p506de284w5ebb5cab7d893256@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908192003p34a367f2q4b99be3cf916cd72@mail.gmail.com> <20090820141835.GB28751@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908201101g3b448d8ck7b406fc481c56f8d@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908201342hd17ce91qac0136124cd3a444@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908201426m6b8feac9v57e9ef1cd73e5c06@mail.gmail.com> <f72742de0908201600y46311454la8db52c4be1b18dc@mail.gmail.com> <b8ef0a220908201609m1c77be2n3d499b7da20fec5a@mail.gmail.com> <20090820235051.GA21280@alinoe.com> <f72742de0908201712u635fa6a6ne6b286bcbca03499@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <f72742de0908201712u635fa6a6ne6b286bcbca03499@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] OGPX WG draft charter, 2009-08-19 revision
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:25:02 -0000

On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:12:20PM -0700, Joshua Bell wrote:
> I disagree with that. As a corporation providing tools to my employees, I may
> dictate policy about where my employees may go using those tools - e.g. they
> may teleport to and bring inventory with corporate content to partner company
> worlds where the companies have signed NDAs, to have meetings to discuss shared
> interests. It is entirely a matter of policy. This is no different than having
> corporate firewalls that block access to certain sites or content.
> 
> That may not be the primary use case (again, see the Web) but we can't discard
> it.

You're right. I wrote a long story with what I really meant (but formulated
wrongly)... and deleted it again :p

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email