Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status
Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 10 October 2009 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 1CD423A686E for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.618
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.618 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.019,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnAfJaJ0pS8Q for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (unknown
[IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id DD1573A6A84 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:02:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.107] (ppp-68-120-198-98.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net
[68.120.198.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8)
with ESMTP id n9A24ZPd021369 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
bits=256 verify=NO) for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:04:41 -0700
Message-ID: <4ACFEBA8.6010508@dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:04:24 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
References: <f72742de0910091542i2e8eda06x9b88cfbcc382e0b6@mail.gmail.com>
<4ACFC2F4.3040105@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4ACFC2F4.3040105@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/9878/Fri Oct 9 08:51:48 2009 on sbh17.songbird.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0
(sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 09 Oct 2009 19:04:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 02:02:58 -0000
Alexey Melnikov wrote: >> Note that if anyone submits a new (-00) draft that they hope to have >> adopted by the working group, they should name it >> "draft-MYNAME-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF". That makes the tracking tools work >> better. The WG tools page (http://tools.ietf.org/wg/vwrap/) will show them >> as related drafts, and if/when they become "draft-ietf-vwrap-OTHER-STUFF", >> the tools will understand that the WG version replaces the individual one. > > A small comment on "tool will understand that ...": I don't think this > happens automatically. But the Secretariat can mark a WG draft as replacing > an individual one. The times I've been part of bringing a private draft into a working group, it required submitting a new draft under the draft-ietf-<wg-name>-<draft-name> label -- even if the text is identical with the the pre-working group version. (I don't know about the Secretariat marking step that Alexey references, but I believe it is in addition to, and after, the submission step I'm citing.) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- [ogpx] VWRAP Status Joshua Bell
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status Infinity Linden (Meadhbh Hamrick)
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Status Alexey Melnikov