Re: [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session

"Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com> Tue, 30 March 2010 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <john.hurliman@intel.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC683A6A75 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.54
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.54 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.930, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FBIpNdG34Xil for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:45:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859D73A6957 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2010 11:46:00 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.51,335,1267430400"; d="scan'208";a="608887176"
Received: from rrsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.170]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Mar 2010 11:46:00 -0700
Received: from rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.39]) by rrsmsx604.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.31.0.170]) with mapi; Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:45:59 -0600
From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman@intel.com>
To: Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com>, ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:45:55 -0600
Thread-Topic: [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session
Thread-Index: AcrLbNwTuF+0WUEcTf2vhW5txqI6oAEzDn/Q
Message-ID: <62BFE5680C037E4DA0B0A08946C0933DCB5FBCBA@rrsmsx506.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <180093C2-AC6E-435B-8AD5-A58B81CCD9FB@lindenlab.com>
In-Reply-To: <180093C2-AC6E-435B-8AD5-A58B81CCD9FB@lindenlab.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual World Region Agent Protocol - IETF working group <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 18:45:37 -0000

> 7) I saw clear dislike for including more detailed semantics of
> matching LLSD payloads against LLIDL descriptions. The combination of
> LLIDL's shape semantics, and LLSD's defaulting and conversions was felt
> to be the right level of specification. Nonetheless, if anyone would
> like a more detailed description of how our open source LLIDL system
> performs matching and validation, I can give pointers to the code, or
> provide a write-up to the mailing list if people want. Just ask.
> 

Mark, can you point me at the LLIDL handling code? I'm interested in LLIDL's application to unit testing.

John