Re: [ogpx] An example to show the problems with defining an OGPX/VWRAP virtual world
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Wed, 02 September 2009 22:55 UTC
Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 00DB928C248 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.354
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.076,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n-IwfJU6GFa4 for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep21-int.chello.at (viefep21-int.chello.at [62.179.121.41])
by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874B23A6CDE for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:55:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge03.upc.biz ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep12-int.chello.at
(InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id
<20090902222423.HRUJ24520.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge03.upc.biz>;
Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:24:23 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge03.upc.biz with edge
id byQN1c00a0FlQed03yQP1w; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:24:23 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from
<carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MiyGu-00020c-Tw; Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:25:44 +0200
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 00:25:44 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: Morgaine <morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <20090902222544.GB6652@alinoe.com>
References: <69830D4127201D4EBD146B9041199718010191FD@EXCHANGE.office.nic.se>
<e0b04bba0909020726m518df37as77b4c129b468f66e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e0b04bba0909020726m518df37as77b4c129b468f66e@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] An example to show the problems with defining
an OGPX/VWRAP virtual world
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:55:33 -0000
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Morgaine wrote: > Fortunately, as David Levine has said a few times, trust agreement technology > does not preclude nil trust, so we can work with this. However, it will be > extremely important to ensure that the nil trust mechanism is actually catered > for in practice in VWRAP, rather than just in theory. +1 -- Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
- [ogpx] An example to show the problems with defin… Magnus Zeisig
- Re: [ogpx] An example to show the problems with d… Morgaine
- [ogpx] +1 on the charter (was: RE: An example to … Hurliman, John
- Re: [ogpx] +1 on the charter (was: RE: An example… Morgaine
- Re: [ogpx] +1 on the charter (was: RE: An example… Dan Olivares
- Re: [ogpx] An example to show the problems with d… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] +1 on the charter (was: RE: An example… Infinity Linden
- Re: [ogpx] +1 on the charter Dave CROCKER
- Re: [ogpx] +1 on the charter (was: RE: An example… Suzy Deffeyes
- Re: [ogpx] An example to show the problems with d… Joshua Bell