Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on Teleports and protocol resilience)
Meadhbh Hamrick <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com> Fri, 30 October 2009 14:42 UTC
Return-Path: <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 43B7A3A69DF for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>;
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.415
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.415 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.028,
BAYES_00=-2.599, SUBJECT_FUZZY_TION=0.156]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8+jPgbjDp4d for
<ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f171.google.com (mail-px0-f171.google.com
[209.85.216.171]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B683A69B9 for
<ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so2037732pxi.32 for <ogpx@ietf.org>;
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=EpH20JJ/Cc9LYRvsIuf1Jtci7wRQFeWR79Keui75x5M=;
b=pkmsxXbnTvKkoOY+q2xSFdBXHLLHfGjal2O7/WfNB9R1NZb763exQ07giVdI5XmPRs
VD20lS6kaiH7Z1/n2xf1RSwzVcxHhYx4gpoqqEGGpE6OIukuCRxYFYx8Px0PKtemJCRP
5aWs5JZDmqNPJ7TpualEp4MMiww9IdBWpMtBk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:cc:content-type;
b=JDBpK2ZwFTvQaTQ/1ld0S4l8nSrNpMhSyO6YS5zTXuUxBI2nuYkXTojUy39bktiRrF
qDy/M7I2fXJJ+vsKNgRl5H/WSits14XtBue8tRJL+AefRYsrTM5beWHFhdqVg+ocyPqv
I9RI4FV5yJQxgqPNU6pGDWG/LxnOxTe7ACGBg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.37.37 with SMTP id p37mr1332346waj.11.1256913762771;
Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9b8a8de40910300456s62ff44ana481e676af6e2a72@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20091028120323.GA9827@alinoe.com>
<20091029130303.GA2298@alinoe.com>
<9b8a8de40910300456s62ff44ana481e676af6e2a72@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:42:42 -0700
Message-ID: <b8ef0a220910300742i7640dbdat72b94b3cf1189028@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Hamrick <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
To: Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was: My take on
Teleports and protocol resilience)
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>,
<mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 14:42:29 -0000
actually, the documents are being written to reflect the discussion here. but i guess what i'm hearing is that you would prefer to see how all the ideas we're presenting line up in a single document. okay. lemme get on that. -cheers -meadhbh On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Vaughn Deluca <vaughn.deluca@gmail.com> wrote: > Nothing wrong with your writing, it is just hard to discuss *anything* > without underlaying documents. What we need are new versions of the drafts. > -Vaughn > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 01:03:23PM +0100, Carlo Wood wrote: >> > If we expect messages that update state to be lost, then there >> > two several ways to recover: >> >> Excuse my English :p ... Obviously I meant "then there two ways..." >> >> While I value Vaughn's responses highly, I was hoping on >> eactions to my posts from others as well... Is it my English, >> making me look like a noob maybe? Or is it too trivial/technical? >> >> -- >> Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> >> _______________________________________________ >> ogpx mailing list >> ogpx@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx > > > _______________________________________________ > ogpx mailing list > ogpx@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx > >
- [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (was:… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Carlo Wood
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Vaughn Deluca
- Re: [ogpx] State "Partitions" should be Abelian (… Meadhbh Hamrick