Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter - 2009 09 01

[Morgaine <[e-mail]>]

Judging by personal mails received on this topic, I sense that sanity is
prevailing, and that there is no desire nor intention to make trigger
concepts such as age, sex, race, religion, creed, DNA genome or any other
sensitive and/or personal information part of the protocol.

It would be the thin end of the wedge, and I'm hoping that people are clever
enough not to go there.

Services are authenticated.  Let that be enough.

Morgaine.





===================================

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 10:21 AM, SM <[e-mail]> wrote:

> At 09:18 04-10-2009, Dickson, Mike (ISS Software) wrote:
>
>> Sure it does if I'm required to authenticate to use it.  That is, if I'm
>> sending using my gmail.com address and I'm required to authenticate to
>> use it then yes, its very possible
>> to make the association.  True, I may be able to find an SMTP server that
>> will accept my
>>
>
> That's mail submission.  I'll skip the discussion about the analogy.
>
> At 11:46 04-10-2009, Vaughn Deluca wrote:
>
>> But the discussion is drifting,  were talking about the way that for
>> instance an age limit might be passed in the protocol.  Carlo said that info
>> was needed, Morgaine set it
>>  has no place in the protocol, using SMTP as an example, Mike stated that
>> it is very well
>>
>
> The discussion seems to be about acquiring policy information to authorize
> access to a resource and whether that should be part of the protocol.  It
> could be age, location or other non-technical information.
>
> Regards,
> -sm
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>