Re: [ogpx] A Review of Multi-Domain Use Cases [Was: Re: OpenID and OGP : beginning the discussion ...]

Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com> Wed, 01 July 2009 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <infinity@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEF553A6CFB for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.747
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.747 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.230, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6-A9Cl5JehG for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6C03A6838 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:11:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe12 with SMTP id 12so1821215yxe.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.138.8 with SMTP id l8mr14038779and.32.1246479093802; Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20090630135751.GA24477@alinoe.com>
References: <b8ef0a220906290413u5a7358eao300c2ff8ee1ab709@mail.gmail.com> <b8ef0a220906290751s5131c401h1d55ace39348c89e@mail.gmail.com> <20090629161121.GA17251@alinoe.com> <20090629161815.GB17251@alinoe.com> <591737.89462.qm@web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <3a880e2c0906291219t1990272fkb276979ebc97d292@mail.gmail.com> <897153.73396.qm@web82601.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4A4926EE.5060509@lindenlab.com> <e0b04bba0906300003y18207430k95f9b8e901dcff87@mail.gmail.com> <20090630135751.GA24477@alinoe.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 13:11:33 -0700
Message-ID: <3a880e2c0907011311t6e989ca0vc2312e2deb3b7587@mail.gmail.com>
From: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>
To: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] A Review of Multi-Domain Use Cases [Was: Re: OpenID and OGP : beginning the discussion ...]
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:11:14 -0000

cool. i think we're in violent agreement.

> Therefore, I'd like to propose this:
>
>  1. Arbitrary in-world name tags, which have only one intent: to provide a
>    customer-satisfying visual name.
>  2. Globally unique identifiers, either UUID or formed by composition of N-part
>    local name @ issuing authority, that remain the same over logins for any
>    given account and that are passed to every viewer that receives 1).
>  3. Entirely separate authentication credentials, in other words, unrelated to
>    1) or 2).