[ogpx] ogpx focus?

Charles Krinke <cfk@pacbell.net> Fri, 12 June 2009 16:02 UTC

Return-Path: <cfk@pacbell.net>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0DA3A6ACB for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:02:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JKjycWFc7bHI for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.125]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 292793A6AAF for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:02:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 71083 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jun 2009 16:03:04 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pacbell.net; s=s1024; t=1244822584; bh=drmBDTQ24EY8enf1ZQFkCIG1eU5RXaiA8/CkKDmeLes=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=PV/PraAdKrhg7eaGx2NpQ34f3xRU6bSt1Ux/pqV6q/gQL+LN9Kdr5O0GwSK8l1m1jZKLdy67gUkJry2VltNElOBI2lSO5NvXwRv+bh59G4Fvzpofo5ZtSiNACbWNdkPB1w32GhrIJmzeNQzuo1bdzI1GvtdGH8BF9zSKyjnm6XU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=pacbell.net; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DHRyROMvnNyPLbG3RWhOtGTLGpOlrF1e1A7S6Z3CYlpGty0cTTRKnJK7EDqdeIu0nBTryy0dO6AzbIG+M71T5MfsFpAkA3kmKHOB744nx/lzCUOh5HFz98NfHZths6ySd1OTmEQ4xiZO9itRHISZEn5mcI+3BWFl+96GaXsp3ds=;
Message-ID: <558312.70763.qm@web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: JbZjfrIVM1nEuH9gjSm0xv72zmDAqKGF.BrXk0wRPKBU71k69Bh1sprWLoXkJj3_mkz.HafKgkbVrhdF_J3Z_7QXslmcjhYLwIZrlFVAzZktMAQ_hqMpDo2fIqerBRWrRIugeeJPQ1ACQHAF6083_UK0c1bHn9RXNvkdRbiwNr8s53wK8eGZ0_gyGb7Eun8hsXowCytrQ.ihyZ5vziCx4yqF3BkYdFjW3cDfsK7BHzZmcp4L0P8F5CQv1LEN6g9N7daw.jJp8Yx_F0pn_1SGlAtRRJS3dsuTwdsS4chKm5S9yqwYLT.RRvi_zCkqnWr4ePA0ag--
Received: from [75.214.91.117] by web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:04 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.43 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10
References: <3a880e2c0906111203x3b0629e0k36579da73ed60b17@mail.gmail.com> <4A323067.3020009@comlounge.net> <3a880e2c0906120854u3f327f0bma9936f26a6101813@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:03:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: Charles Krinke <cfk@pacbell.net>
To: ogpx@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3a880e2c0906120854u3f327f0bma9936f26a6101813@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-301543942-1244822584=:70763"
Subject: [ogpx] ogpx focus?
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:02:59 -0000

I would like to see if we concur on a few points, if I may. And I am not trying to stir up controversy, but rather understand some of the feelings of where this will eventually go.

As I understand where ogp *might* go, it will be a protocol that will allow two seperate virtual worlds to eventually, as peers, both run a sete of master servers currently called domain servers, I believe.

In that case, each world will be able, as a peer, to negotiate via packets, the interop from worldA to worldB (or from worldB to worldA).

That is, we are not contemplating that there is only one domain server at SecondLife, but that, say, OSGrid could run its own domain server and have reciprocity?

Charles