Re: [ogpx] VWRAP Draft Charter: 2009 08 28 revision

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Meadhbh Siobhan
<meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> >
> > Imho, the whole effort of this group is meaningless unless the end result
> > will make it possible for many independent parties to take part in
> > creating one big virtual world. The more (policy) restrictions are
> > *necessary* for an acceptable interop, the less this effort will
> > have succeeded; hence, it should be an important, of not the most
> > important goal of this working group!
> >
>
> +1

That expression of support looks promising.  The main barriers preventing us
from achieving this are:

   1. Our inability to even discuss multiple virtual worlds because the
   language in the drafts overloads the term with a fictitious new "virtual
   world" that clashes with the normal usage.
   2. The lack of a listed deliverable that would require us to ensure that
   the proposed protocol does actually deliver interop between distinct virtual
   worlds that implement VWRAP.

I hope we can turn the expressed desire for cross-world interop into
something concrete.

Morgaine.

==========================

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:54 AM, Meadhbh Siobhan
<meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>wrote;wrote:

> >
> > Imho, the whole effort of this group is meaningless unless the end result
> > will make it possible for many independent parties to take part in
> > creating one big virtual world. The more (policy) restrictions are
> > *necessary* for an acceptable interop, the less this effort will
> > have succeeded; hence, it should be an important, of not the most
> > important goal of this working group!
> >
>
> +1
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>