IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] Informal draft for discussion -- client sidecapabilitiesand setup flows

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 25 June 2009 19:27 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48673A6A91 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.576
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OYnuxFuYRb8F for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:27:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989103A67B5 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [94.197.225.41] (94.197.225.41.threembb.co.uk [94.197.225.41]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SkPPVABV9JM5@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:26:14 +0100
Message-ID: <4A43CF28.8050803@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:25:28 +0100
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Infinity Linden <infinity@lindenlab.com>
References: <4A3BE302.5070405@isode.com> <OF68EA1CF7.7097A5B8-ON852575DF.005D4F02-852575DF.005DFB80@us.ibm.com> <4A43ABDF.1010800@lindenlab.com> <3a880e2c0906251113t380353caw17dba4d5537abd90@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3a880e2c0906251113t380353caw17dba4d5537abd90@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] Informal draft for discussion -- client sidecapabilitiesand setup flows
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:27:15 -0000

Infinity Linden wrote:
 [...]

>with respect to JSON vs. XML, i have no personal preference per se.
>however, if XML examples lead people to believe we're using a fixed
>XML schema, then JSON examples may lead other people to believe our
>system is stock 4627 JSON, which it isn't. maybe both?
>
It would be better to avoid having both. If you can't avoid, make one of 
them normative and the other one informative.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email