IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue

Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com> Sun, 30 August 2009 19:54 UTC

Return-Path: <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962903A6C08 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O5xMTOt3nYfj for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f200.google.com (mail-iw0-f200.google.com [209.85.223.200]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D723A68BA for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn38 with SMTP id 38so1566963iwn.29 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kLYRAu+Xf9t1Q2Az4KGYpGjf/bhALKuqsMHIWGVbPzo=; b=eSAMcprUsR29HTpjHUqlU5j5HlHn6o4G+ZqOJEfKMfrpoPuLgT6r+yNGQ/YSTUkRfX /ZQQ8NroB0ej5y1IvnWLQHRFEp1/q7ActyJs+wqhJ0g+hjsDg45V6YYxyk9k2YpT7DUA TJA78ArxiyIxK01MzGxn0JZZU94OOh0s8qxcE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IfTtIiJiLb9EpSQ8X9s+CW/iZz6rEh+wb0IFaIdymFPpGrsSqhwJmm4r0u5ywTEnep R2CS8aVzjF6uZyXY1gjQRgYbIRXakIwfsxY5+X+x1eTCuACD9fI5UmH07QGcUG993Ia5 OgWkovpPN9TSgA0Ec4Udl2BaisI7lAlcLVi2Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.124.227 with SMTP id v35mr5561085ibr.18.1251662081882; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9abf48a60908301209g6ef6ae14ndd380593b4ddf0cb@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908211129l7d9defa5od81261e3e5805714@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908280416w60e9c7cdre7e3eaef3e244cb1@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908281056q373b1dd4gf36a9e24cf3d8bfc@mail.gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD6FE8098411@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <3a880e2c0908281259h3a10cd02mc92eb8331c92f162@mail.gmail.com> <20090829232125.GC22756@alinoe.com> <6c9fcc2a0908300553x57c76279p9a95c105f0e7e34a@mail.gmail.com> <20090830130045.GA29271@alinoe.com> <b8ef0a220908301154m331f685fh6237811b42cbfe2a@mail.gmail.com> <9abf48a60908301209g6ef6ae14ndd380593b4ddf0cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:54:41 -0700
Message-ID: <b8ef0a220908301254y7fe45068h1d7b7dd3ac8a5da9@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:54:40 -0000

thank goodness it was me misunderstanding this.

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Barry Leiba<barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>> what version of the draft are you looking at? the most recent version
>> uses "protocol" almost exclusively (using "protocols" only in one spot
>> near the initialism OGPX.)
>
> Carlo meant that the draft charter correctly has an "s" in "worlds"
> (not in "protocols").
>
> Barry
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email