Re: [ogpx] ogpx focus?

Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com> Fri, 12 June 2009 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7453A6C49 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7IjOSxNxKyNU for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7663A68CE for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c3so1117974ana.4 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=bwrc+0ZKlqGRXM6nMYe/BqQdGsMmHC59u21NYVutWsE=; b=XtMFLuCwGnVx/dWk4ZvgLdCjNjdiRAYuAFEVlM5wEPfhYuy9rfDkkflJzObEC2Baxd xix19N8Gf0+gKvkdYVL1uPKG7Y50tu5u15z7we+KXTM/AW9irLy1acs/5utSwNmpnih4 F9b96oEKF58AQpq6I2OHileB2vHfhwQPJp8Z4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TFRd9gJFGcuWlo4cpCdIgJpVL/VLCQX/NwXVKP3vbB6FVJ14mUAOwfDWLx76pfB2XU Z4bkiZ3ZaHm9rNBPzkr/rp4vnfzWtEYbnuijSsYTxwFf+3jgeT7dQU2m9djx+oaOS5GD AIoJP/ahQKr8jyJpQt8xqG3r8GrGOFGWhZkgQ=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.211.11 with SMTP id j11mr5086868ang.101.1244823816641; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <558312.70763.qm@web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
References: <3a880e2c0906111203x3b0629e0k36579da73ed60b17@mail.gmail.com> <4A323067.3020009@comlounge.net> <3a880e2c0906120854u3f327f0bma9936f26a6101813@mail.gmail.com> <558312.70763.qm@web82608.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:36 -0700
Message-ID: <b8ef0a220906120923u712cc01v9d06f6b9d180b537@mail.gmail.com>
From: Meadhbh Siobhan <meadhbh.siobhan@gmail.com>
To: Charles Krinke <cfk@pacbell.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016368e1d1a66217d046c29212d
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] ogpx focus?
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:23:31 -0000

essentially yes, you're spot on.
one of the core concepts of OGP is that it separates the "agent domain" from
the "region domain". so if you have a collection of users, you're
essentially an agent domain. if you have a collection of simulators, you're
a region domain. if you have both, you're simultaneously an agent and region
domain. you can be both, but you don't have to be. and if you're writing
software that conforms to OGP, you're supposed to allow agent and region
services to be offered by different organizations.

so yes, some day we hope to see someone whose account is owned by linden lab
teleport over to OSGrid server and conversely an avatar defined on an OSGrid
server teleport over agni (the main Second Life grid.) All without having to
log out of one grid and log back in on another. last summer, our interop
test allowed avatars whose account was defined in our beta grid's agent
domain to teleport to a remote region running a modified instance of
OpenSim. Word from Zha is that IBM has an agent domain whose code will get
published after a legal review.

so right. we envisioning a future where the relationships between service
providers are peer-like (like the peering arrangements of large ISPs.) and
to a large degree, OGP is an attempt to define a protocol that can support
this model.

-cheers
-meadhbh

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Charles Krinke <cfk@pacbell.net> wrote:

> I would like to see if we concur on a few points, if I may. And I am not
> trying to stir up controversy, but rather understand some of the feelings of
> where this will eventually go.
>
> As I understand where ogp *might* go, it will be a protocol that will allow
> two seperate virtual worlds to eventually, as peers, both run a sete of
> master servers currently called domain servers, I believe.
>
> In that case, each world will be able, as a peer, to negotiate via packets,
> the interop from worldA to worldB (or from worldB to worldA).
>
> That is, we are not contemplating that there is only one domain server at
> SecondLife, but that, say, OSGrid could run its own domain server and have
> reciprocity?
>
> Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>