Re: [ogpx] where does VWRAP fit?

Let me try using fewer words:

VWRAP should be the protocol suite for enabling movement of an agent between
two regions.

Please note that the above statement says NOTHING about how the agent or
regions are administered. Those regions could be part of one virtual world
or two virtual worlds. They could be operated by one service provider or
two; the agent services may be provided by one of the same or yet a third.

Is there rough consensus on that statement? Does anyone see anything in
contradiction between that statement and the draft charter?

Morgaine: You keep quoting Meadhbh's comment from Aug 30th. Based on
feedback received regarding that comment, we (multiple mailing list members)
came to understand that there was confusion about terminology. The charter
was then refined appropriately to avoid confusion and focus on technical
terminology such as "regions" and "agents" that have clear meaning and
aren't a source of confusion. Please stop beating that dead horse.

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Morgaine
<morgaine.dinova@googlemail.com>wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you comment in detail to my post of 4 september too, Morgaine?
>
>
>
> Sure Carlo, I've just done it, and I'll post it shortly.  You wrote a long
> post, so it took a while to answer in detail as requested.  :-)
>
> Morgaine.
>
>
>
> ================================
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you comment in detail to my post of 4 september too, Morgaine?
>>
>> --
>> Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx
>
>