Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update

Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> Thu, 24 September 2009 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131813A690D for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.504
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igDqe6ewScnq for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E13A67CF for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so2272021yxe.32 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y1ozldQJqTSRaR18WV1dUEkPYe7NlV6w19sHt7TWrK4=; b=kX7tU4G0ToEoUe3tuUn0R6QKSJCMPnSJp++NH4p81hc+1isjleNyZZBgqt/1DdcvCy N5GVZ1+5J/cqG6d4KP4bAeVsbcyVUFjAFsZrzmcRCscs/oxW6xGuAmY8tm6yQEF8S1Bf /+ZXaf43vWbXBwvLUPGLH8TWr1+GBLqiaQYqo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H9u0GYrz3scSS0m7sSl0v8hmvN6j4s/zrSDiWqa7ow7Go/oaDT4hYlckp9le9Hjc1l U16sr4+o0OPjOcHnBsn/6EHOfZrtykWfa2MfuJSaeqOzi3zwdJLsUG983uc83+NRd215 Z9a8fBMjszVjAWcPo+V/DNMvP14YFD7UmC9QU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.150.2.9 with SMTP id 9mr592215ybb.58.1253819736313; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:15:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0909221330u41bc9ca5u98dca58e01378e41@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6c9fcc2a0909221330u41bc9ca5u98dca58e01378e41@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 15:15:36 -0400
Message-ID: <6c9fcc2a0909241215n7c1efc02rf81484f9bef7491@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
To: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: barryleiba@computer.org
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:14:31 -0000

No replies....
I know I only posted this yesterday, but I thought there might be more
response.  Please, if you plan to participate in the working group, in
general, I'd like your comment on the wisdom/value of trying to meet
in Hiroshima, yes or no.  If you want to participate and aim to be at
IETF 77 in Anaheim (the week of 21 March, 2010), but won't attend if
we have a meeting at IETF 76 in Hiroshima, I'd like to know that as
well.

Barry

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Barry Leiba
<barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have an administrative update about the VWRAP charter:
> It's moving along apace, and will be discussed on this week's IESG
> telechat on Thursday.  That means that the working group may be
> chartered imminently, a good 2 to 4 weeks sooner than I'd anticipated.
>  Many thanks to Alexey Melnikov for moving it ahead quickly for us!
>
> Now, let's not count chicken avatars yet, because nothing is certain
> until it's done, and we're past the nominal deadline for session
> requests at IETF 76 anyway, but:
> - It's likely that we'll be chartered soon enough.
> - We can probably get a session scheduled if I ask Marcia nicely.
>
> So, just floating the question, for now: Do we want one?  If we have a
> VWRAP session at IETF 76 in Hiroshima (the week of 8 November), will
> people come?  Will we have work to do there?
>
> Barry (OGPX BOF chair)