Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Fri, 25 September 2009 00:07 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AB228C11E for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.195, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z3jqQj4OyH2w for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [62.179.121.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8B83A67A6 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 17:07:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge02.upc.biz ([192.168.13.237]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090925000843.TZCO24520.viefep12-int.chello.at@edge02.upc.biz>; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:08:43 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge02.upc.biz with edge id ko8h1c04y0FlQed02o8iUd; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:08:43 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1MqyNF-0003NX-GN; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:09:21 +0200
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 02:09:21 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
Message-ID: <20090925000921.GA12647@alinoe.com>
References: <6c9fcc2a0909221330u41bc9ca5u98dca58e01378e41@mail.gmail.com> <6c9fcc2a0909241215n7c1efc02rf81484f9bef7491@mail.gmail.com> <702343.73134.qm@web59105.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <382d73da0909241317y703bbeeaucd91e687d0d028f9@mail.gmail.com> <20090924225806.GA8798@alinoe.com> <6c9fcc2a0909241612q1f6dcd4chb2e561a7b1873d26@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0909241612q1f6dcd4chb2e561a7b1873d26@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx <ogpx@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [ogpx] VWRAP working group charter update
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 00:07:36 -0000

Ok, ok ... but perhaps it's time to try a video conference,
or even just a 'skype' meeting for a change, without airplane and
hotel costs.

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 07:12:03PM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> wrote:
> > But, apart from that I cannot afford to (and also not for other reasons)
> > participate in real life meetings (outside my city and/or starting before
> > 1 pm); I don't understand why this can't be done online... only knowledge
> > and data needs to be exchanged. Why is a real life meeting necessary?
> 
> To be clear:
> IETF process specifies that official work is done on the mailing list,
> and so anything that's "decided" at a face-to-face meeting, on a
> conference call, or over any other means (IM or VW, for example) must
> be re-confirmed on the mailing list.
> 
> It is NOT necessary for anyone to travel to the meetings in order to
> participate.
> 
> That said, the IETF holds three face-to-face meetings each year (and
> some working groups hold interim working-group meetings; I doubt this
> group will do that).  These meetings allow for a great deal of
> high-bandwidth interaction and discussion, and usually enable us to
> get a lot of work done that would be more difficult or more protracted
> without the opportunity to get people into a room together.  We find
> that people get a lot out of attending in person.
> 
> Assuming it's chartered, the VRAP working group WILL be meeting at the
> face-to-face IETF meetings -- at least at most of them.  The question
> is whether we should try to meet in Hiroshima, given how soon it is.
> But I'll repeat: whether or not we meet in Hiroshima, and whether or
> not you (meaning any participant) attend ANY of the face-to-face
> meetings, have no effect on your participation in the working group.
> You become a full participant merely by participating here, on the
> mailing list.
> 
> Barry (long-time IETF participant, working-group chair, and former IAB member)
> _______________________________________________
> ogpx mailing list
> ogpx@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>