Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue

Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com> Sun, 30 August 2009 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <carlo@alinoe.com>
X-Original-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ogpx@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B08F28C0EB for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.344
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.344 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_AT=0.424, HOST_EQ_AT=0.745]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dz2l2CTiSWw3 for <ogpx@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viefep13-int.chello.at (viefep13-int.chello.at [62.179.121.33]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D3928C0F5 for <ogpx@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from edge04.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep13-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.09.01.00 201-2219-108-20080618) with ESMTP id <20090830125935.QMFL2474.viefep13-int.chello.at@edge04.upc.biz>; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:59:35 +0200
Received: from mail9.alinoe.com ([77.250.43.12]) by edge04.upc.biz with edge id aczY1c0840FlQed04czZiS; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 14:59:35 +0200
X-SourceIP: 77.250.43.12
Received: from carlo by mail9.alinoe.com with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <carlo@alinoe.com>) id 1Mhk1V-0007ee-UP; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:00:46 +0200
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 15:00:45 +0200
From: Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>
To: barryleiba@computer.org
Message-ID: <20090830130045.GA29271@alinoe.com>
References: <3a880e2c0908211129l7d9defa5od81261e3e5805714@mail.gmail.com> <479011.65903.qm@web111210.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <e0b04bba0908280416w60e9c7cdre7e3eaef3e244cb1@mail.gmail.com> <e0b04bba0908281056q373b1dd4gf36a9e24cf3d8bfc@mail.gmail.com> <4646639E08F58B42836FAC24C94624DD6FE8098411@GVW0433EXB.americas.hpqcorp.net> <3a880e2c0908281259h3a10cd02mc92eb8331c92f162@mail.gmail.com> <20090829232125.GC22756@alinoe.com> <6c9fcc2a0908300553x57c76279p9a95c105f0e7e34a@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <6c9fcc2a0908300553x57c76279p9a95c105f0e7e34a@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: ogpx@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [ogpx] resolving the name issue
X-BeenThere: ogpx@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Virtual Worlds and the Open Grid Protocol <ogpx.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ogpx>
List-Post: <mailto:ogpx@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ogpx>, <mailto:ogpx-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:59:30 -0000

On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:53:58AM -0400, Barry Leiba wrote:
> As I read things, it should stand for Virtual World Region/Agent
> Protocols (note the final "s"), giving the name the flexibility to
> cover multiple related protocols (one of which could certainly be
> called "VWRAP" as well, and would, in that case, have no "s".

Virtual Worlds Region/Agent Protocol(s)

no opinion yet on the s behind Protocol, but there should be
an 's' behind Worlds.

This is already done correctly in the draft.

-- 
Carlo Wood <carlo@alinoe.com>