Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-ohttp-00-00: (with COMMENT)
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 16 June 2021 23:25 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2D3A0BC5; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WhbmYhUtn8ps; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C9E3A0BC6; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id i13so3802332ilk.3; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=baDXp8bS5F3PIMSda5IJZVnXozwPZm+DSNG83X3rrwg=; b=bYV4R9GP+s+JKWJTtq5YI8vXeZuYXPODWuU8UlWYOrHIFGhHADPFOZBXZlsyevBLgm cNUNegiyLekm5KirHXMcbWW83WaqjPb010d3vc3pN8Qs/WYcek9mz222OIpKEQDctlMq b/51EbTWn7orMPSp3SKnDrhyvc7AhwoAoB9zn9BLPThvAmlKZ+0rQQ6WFUdCeyfX63IP 4WwSKnXwFqweE3hiB7uJkd3c5qa7QXJIthVBX1Wx/9ARIbiZhTFbatEvN93OhmJIoETP HCja5+OuLFyfN/SKkm23nEzDrc/tXo7ePDRgoXPm9qzQMdeMaIR3xC863G9CS9Yxb7Go fO3g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=baDXp8bS5F3PIMSda5IJZVnXozwPZm+DSNG83X3rrwg=; b=f+waYzWvhRlHPYKcoJZsKDYiKylHgNb0UjSv8whr4n7AqcSK+p7Y+AN+NUnXjWog3V 8CyhVetx+VfzyQ1VjpYTdkzDJYQw4UUQpSc6wJa/nIlsfC4dgU3f3wCx1A7Pk1JG15Y5 WScmhTe+KRygXDAt3RmAZ+/rCvTO9Y2FIBMKWA1JjCcwZs5zC29U6qgEmaB+O9V3EAOG tUMYqOwDsWFVbJZmYVTgqV2ls9rYxJyhNOJjiH5Q+cX4524izwzDEC1toSZMFxWQswPg PsO4LE2a2KNvb1Yvl3AmtveRmgZz7XomFKl7ABe8dofOvemu6447i7UvirhRXwE/YD+e rrZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bZzCATm8LqjpkOeSgcHVg4wV0ONqgrb/NM8LMO6TEyy7pr3V7 tG2PR3LorXsmKUSfQS0Nt49DQG0QHuSQMl8wjLs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyog3BKv2RRua1XDwh59KW2yKrvFbLq935j5Iw2M+YDqHjWjc0PiwwOUTKfpGQ9121YqHSPwz3xFuwkmSCzJeg=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d94c:: with SMTP id l12mr1395937ilq.272.1623885909471; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162388203918.20149.1169138810781121804@ietfa.amsl.com> <c47f493a-3928-42e3-849d-3deadd29d5cd@www.fastmail.com> <CAM4esxRaOw6D6j+bRCTZcQwUgFQ1eXTq+Dg3B=WnBw=ihwMp6g@mail.gmail.com> <38472e82-5545-4973-ba27-2d42d76bf001@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <38472e82-5545-4973-ba27-2d42d76bf001@www.fastmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:24:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTDh5Y_gp7SotBtEVEF_k9JOX-7Sv2F2xHxhTN+XuKoVg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ohttp@ietf.org, ohttp-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ca364305c4ea662c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ohttp/eKbm10WVC8A7GpCPsKfcPzuXVYY>
Subject: Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-ietf-ohttp-00-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ohttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oblivious HTTP <ohttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ohttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ohttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:25:17 -0000
If so, then let's explicitly rule that out in the charter. On Wed, Jun 16, 2021, 16:13 Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021, at 08:36, Martin Duke wrote: > > Yeah, it makes sense. We don't need the design in the charter, but some > > sense of the requirements that drove the design would be helpful. > > > > Is service discovery in scope? Will example.com tell me via alt-svc or > > something that example.proxy.com can give me oblivious access to the > > same resources? > > The charter does not include that, so I would say that a recharter would > be needed to add that capability. There are a bunch of questions that come > up when it comes to discovery. (In case you are interested, > https://github.com/unicorn-wg/oblivious-http/issues/19 lists a few things > that might be discovered.) >
- [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter-iet… Martin Duke via Datatracker
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Martin Duke
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Martin Duke
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Christopher Wood
- Re: [Ohttp] Martin Duke's No Objection on charter… Martin Thomson