Re: [Ohttp] renaming the WG-to-be?

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 30 July 2021 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77CE3A129C for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=NvGtKbQO; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=f/pDQ1J2
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ui7JQcUX0Cfq for <ohttp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAEC73A1297 for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:44:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148AD5C00EE for <ohttp@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:44:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:44:53 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=IeQCexJ12uAZ/yAuxUu+knkORsI+0qU EttOoYcaUF2w=; b=NvGtKbQOC5YFgJnrScVTlSLfdH6IjwPJQ3g/bt+SE2PNLF0 s+i+aLIrwIs07pM0/6r6x7CqcCxrXJLV9vDVZdTrpnUSzOYFrHKJTVOWL825Vazs tGVLJwPFAeXY6fVR8ORQEWI2+2nB2jpqc/VjWgfGtZikhCagU8YGFaeoC7WbtOcp RDefc/dhHa99F6uuD6PmGV6rDKwjq5pWbec5o9wY4Uo2sjHOmxdcxBJB4kietJpP nEpyi9XuljP4Ox1ViDyL+j5X4CbW+eUD1dvFpc98lXsKv4ea0IYnyoxlWfVoIwK8 r9cP007mRmcT47iVvAaBjYj7RwMJK02aKrxn1wA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=IeQCex J12uAZ/yAuxUu+knkORsI+0qUEttOoYcaUF2w=; b=f/pDQ1J2vgQ3o8HatK+aX7 ryBrGbVxBoMtqAB8Kd1R5eXCANqGrYoFty1Rz2Zz49tzYm7nZMSTtfHDEEdpdbIi jW8GwQ4P/EQ7nw4gxNorXqBkAdm4TS6uYdrzMEo+awWQcWCIV5RmeKo+I8EO8jL4 T7flWSoynzKkMUffA0CKHAWVE+VUvIG1nuDaPnBnAooFQ+9pDrrUXdh3GHNt6W1V 9pjeU4r6IH+5mEWWX9D+DYX5EArgTIkLkxOKDfc0kVh/bNgj9IQgMtocKaOIPpVd 8JdcEFWrK1kALPn7iqEMBxzQTsRcgmCk1xr/h71e5G/dfZHM8/CjO6trV/nikNsA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:hEsDYQ0lqrI_Alqb2W9Tf0OvEu-f6Iix5-FuIq4KyJmB14UU5tsFYQ> <xme:hEsDYbGQraV0wwZVMF1ViDWsbztK83cOSFUR8_9Y3ZEoDehP9uYQfCNtr6HJ1BsHn T-CZWB1g3psGqOSQ0s>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrheeggddvtdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekve fhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeejgeffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:hEsDYY75cVOUm-3PhdCWzON5axkNZXVvht-cMZrCYxgqbgdqf4qbvA> <xmx:hEsDYZ1BiGWWpCCwKeWmNaU5MarRJ44bZVOXuvSIA-_BDeFGPIX8aQ> <xmx:hEsDYTHC9oR-oX347nlpYMzS3NeRKH_bx3PVpe9EHqgAPlZCDCXwvA> <xmx:hUsDYXREI6-z4w65lZe35KPqNbFlC46VGSm0m2avlg0kPGEeLgfZUA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 97DA43C0471; Thu, 29 Jul 2021 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-545-g7a4eea542e-fm-20210727.001-g7a4eea54
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <25e1e4c2-8aa4-44ca-b441-ac5a28ff182c@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <519D4BA4-0EE2-444D-A615-8F4847139140@rfc1035.com>
References: <CACsn0ckC9trR_HsFfn37=+rTTBhe-Z_hGiZJZ6GWPXiS_eanZw@mail.gmail.com> <2111623045.1384.1627468504245@appsuite-gw1.open-xchange.com> <519D4BA4-0EE2-444D-A615-8F4847139140@rfc1035.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:44:31 +1000
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: ohttp@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ohttp/yfbQCj5lUYhisy1rriRlQOb4zjg>
Subject: Re: [Ohttp] renaming the WG-to-be?
X-BeenThere: ohttp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Oblivious HTTP <ohttp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ohttp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ohttp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ohttp>, <mailto:ohttp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2021 00:44:59 -0000

On Wed, Jul 28, 2021, at 20:57, Jim Reid wrote:
> How about obfuscated HTTP?

Obfuscation is not the goal at all though.  We are deliberately making use of the mechanism comprehensible.

Obfuscation is also weaker than what this provides, which is encryption.