Re: [Openpgp-dt] settling on OCB nonce size of 120 bits?

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Tue, 05 April 2022 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5843A118E for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=MNjDm7cL; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=k8qxFe6p
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f_yNztHunwuo for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:116::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EDB53A1189 for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 13:51:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1649191916; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=VcnRMe/wwtTMn6xeAINMQN5pSAKjGnTu+J6HHfCG1WM=; b=MNjDm7cLJVEGUiY97cDTDw6xxz34p1/zv8K8AakgvTkx22h7e4N9IvPwNt0PZPBqgr8MW K33a52WfP5Q2A0TDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1649191916; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=VcnRMe/wwtTMn6xeAINMQN5pSAKjGnTu+J6HHfCG1WM=; b=k8qxFe6pLdPRp2ZMNVs9Tx/klmeMRGr+S79zqju/LE6shwkWVq+5VlogNexA9ia/DrLA5 pgdzM+oWSPIf4bRGp6Jk55Nu5wWPxkizTS5Qm/Pi6+m4LJ+FZJPjguFO66UNvB6fnsiA0dC N51l0Rxs6eRre0tpqbNJbab1bSQV2BvQXRFok1kXcxSj7dKoZY1abjPZXfBhXu+uLPlHRYr kAommcBjutXBodK7Cq/fR5eN94/rZIoj7S3rJTjfskpBBOB4VsQcZG0WS374nLBugMazEIS 8v/iQZGyG30da+VBtSKJnFfb/sJAOqqVFLJg4rCQsKgCYrHVx7JrTtpZPJkw==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (2603-8000-df00-593c-0c5d-9165-325b-66aa.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:df00:593c:c5d:9165:325b:66aa]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77889F9AD; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:51:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 35F6E2037D; Tue, 5 Apr 2022 16:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <11caf936-97b3-40e3-3cd3-7bcb5f865a18@nohats.ca>
References: <87fsmwmylw.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <11caf936-97b3-40e3-3cd3-7bcb5f865a18@nohats.ca>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 13:51:51 -0700
Message-ID: <87lewjl0d4.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/46k4nOTIWeL3WEWWtatBtmyJrfY>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] settling on OCB nonce size of 120 bits?
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 20:52:04 -0000

On Tue 2022-04-05 15:08:26 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2022, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
>> I worked with Ted Krovetz to construct test vectors for OCB with 120-bit
>> nonces using similar code to the code that generated the 96-bit nonce
>> test vectors in the OCB RFC:
>>
>>    https://gitlab.com/dkg/ocb-test-vectors
>
> Can I encourage you to put this into a draft and throw it into LAMPS?
> We are also doing something similar for test keys by Peter Guttman:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gutmann-testkeys/

I'm happy to put these vectors in an IETF draft, but i didn't know where
to put it.  how did you decide that LAMPS is the right group?  there's
nothing PKIX or S/MIME about it.

>> Does anyone want to try to gather more data, or can we just close the
>> issue?
>
> I'm fine with closing the issue.

I've just closed it, thanks for the feedback!

     --dkg