Re: [Openpgp-dt] a bit of a pause in progress

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Tue, 20 September 2022 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A62C14CE26 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:51:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zWLBbO1hDVvD for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:51:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-4322.protonmail.ch (mail-4322.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF9C0C14CF09 for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Sep 2022 13:51:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:51:17 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1663707081; x=1663966281; bh=WdDCpBUYn69oAg8TqkztAznL/CWZbWdFDwxh5yOKJ3M=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=gwLtZirD3kX3UCksjw+pGU4buILGhRx4fXOHg/5d8u1dSNSetQB1N9Nsecf3t+VRG McjHZ2XQaWJ5r5anTmu57VaKUqYogch+aRXZNybgZNkXP+9trxAp2dwKHLW96JaEJs JWNm24qexVx9wv1y9yGyiNV2XW/FJOL6Zvm4bxKkSGe1gOKpESzOl6nRm6D3u9anaV 55e5GnnPPmiofwURbl3EGP3K/hg9i9yrCosTYOwz9QFJ5Vy/FUh4cz3QRL2GhNMx8Q eUZSDMyZwXPACWRfhf/c0AopTlAaceMQboebdQvy+/ysmeV4C2/F5DG3ed3uDWKt7c wtwl+w1B26Lzg==
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Eas3Z0APWELOjvMeJAmSAd2Uj9751l44HJqvvGeUsbwpwgEXj6Q4Cwtwp7XdW0c8mpuZ2SJZAeswysYbADfRKOv43aFs8Mk_arVV5dO9XvQ=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <78fa1eab-29a3-ef69-75ac-d1d5ac4a622e@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <852ef22b-704a-ee2a-a812-9306e54dcf20@cs.tcd.ie> <i2LvkgkJjA_Xk-SskKrym2viigCnT_vF_XslHOwjVg_k1Q1QTrGLyO1AyF8b889TmIGOEf4Gfmz_TwVxsNyIN0L7qsobG5EuNLjpDDrSzXc=@protonmail.com> <78fa1eab-29a3-ef69-75ac-d1d5ac4a622e@cs.tcd.ie>
Feedback-ID: 2934448:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/5IdhNaRkP9ABHbyG8MpJZavBDxU>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] a bit of a pause in progress
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2022 20:51:28 -0000

On Tuesday, September 20th, 2022 at 13:43, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> Understood. The existence of the new draft is new information
> though so could affect consensus (or not). Once we (chairs)
> have enough information, we'll ask the WG list and see where
> that goes.
> 
> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> PS: a 17-0 poll isn't really what gets us rough consensus
> (but is helpful), if you want to read much more about that
> kind of thing: [1] :-)
> 
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7282/

Yeah, fair enough. Thanks!

Best,
Daniel