Re: [Openpgp-dt] 20211011 DT meeting notes

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Wed, 13 October 2021 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA6A3A0BA6 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:44:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LDA5N0werrag for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3DC53A0B9E for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 08:44:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4HTdcP6DwwzKP6; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:41:25 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1634096485; bh=hZtUkBTqFqNoHliBpaNKTbBduHZDHSKCS4I7FtD70HE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=gGsfvkka+DqOCjwpkBbFtzzejJgJzj1zondIPmNHSZQLlJtSOwdMmH2upvVyqnG1/ lw5EUM/lb7vdr+ONFJWXUKyDqYidVBWixQe7xTEwKgYrZU23e+JeBM1CDBgkNkESPH dRgpZdx3NhPvVvigXk3nllYvYOZX6n+tSHAwFye4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ChQ7HjhFWqKl; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 13 Oct 2021 05:41:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98F6B123F03; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DD0123F02; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:56:24 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:56:24 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <5baa7b16-390d-5a0c-52a2-24c9468da13a@cs.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <dadeb285-b9d9-a35-14d1-ebf26953cd98@nohats.ca>
References: <5baa7b16-390d-5a0c-52a2-24c9468da13a@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/BZ0110dl18dDar9XORp61eBbbq0>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] 20211011 DT meeting notes
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2021 15:44:28 -0000

On Mon, 11 Oct 2021, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> ## https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/64
>     - Daniel H did some more work on table presentation
>     - action on Daniel H: change byte->octet string

Can some DT members show they approve the current PR with Daniel's
latest changes?

> ## https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/66
> - action on DKG to rebase this based on 64 (once reviewed)

I'm waiting on dkg for this one, but if people approve 64, I can also
look at picking it up if dkg hasn't gotten to it yet. Perhaps dkg is
waiting on 64 to be merged first as well.

These have all been merged now: 35, 69, 70, 71, 72

Paul