Re: [Openpgp-dt] Meeting this week?

Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com> Mon, 27 June 2022 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94F3C15AAD3 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:01:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id b8qMfedkLBT4 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-40134.protonmail.ch (mail-40134.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.134]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D08C15CF2D for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 09:01:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:01:15 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1656345682; x=1656604882; bh=om4+eCnwFGAohIJep8ERtO0keSZimjSezHatQiOvZmc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To: Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=NHtIJjQqoV8ECe/+EAfbkTtSLXbArVdo7aPGwRNNyrCC7Jl0R3/MNmJQyRdBFC8ix d02MBT7ghdYZNytfwDmFsRzHVuCifNbC3sWXSiyuSACeaa8wa0UPTOQsE87AA6MUFa LrpEIGtyh3TiEbRHnH0hftxI8AnLhcN3MLNL/cWQCFqcAdtcWmOmhHkWiiB1iFCyk5 nkh4Mo0FbnkxymLu48WwY3UgHRMG0yHxkJnnj26Bwv5GdZf8v+25zYQzV0PMl6M0SE enHDml568Ghe02/I8t6nUNk+0796BSUnye0227MMK71bTnX9cVhgmMDXCN6ufa3Ff5 tiaAH+uIL9bxA==
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
From: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>, openpgp-dt@ietf.org
Reply-To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <ZYVtqA_DDTNC6nl1WEaL_wjHqzQb2aXfiSFY2dUFripBkhoKUz_VMgx3o15YD1yODrFKYYM2N1wh_qmFQyHMP2n3A0_f9A5SkrBQCjh72rc=@protonmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f25b1011-804b-e33f-fee-a6a5493d8741@nohats.ca>
References: <PE_TQYMTbxwbWXF6Bh7Mp_c6EeRExwcsTiRrhjHEAYXzaJk6Q2amlmsWuwZR-8VmV8Ve5U2QSOcytNx3iKj-e6ze2bdkOaPvpLrvk9B6qMs=@protonmail.com> <bbf2af21-2577-7eeb-a1e3-2a7326225f63@cs.tcd.ie> <f25b1011-804b-e33f-fee-a6a5493d8741@nohats.ca>
Feedback-ID: 2934448:user:proton
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/QCQpw4aS3qtR99cTHTQFEoeSUC0>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] Meeting this week?
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 16:01:29 -0000

Sure, fair enough. Some of the MRs, e.g. !205 and !201, are fairly
independent from the WG discussions, but of course they're also less
important so I'm fine with discussing them at a later date.

Best,
Daniel


------- Original Message -------
On Monday, June 27th, 2022 at 17:28, Paul Wouters wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Jun 2022, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> > But - if we thought we were at a point where we had
> > enough to try get a -07 out the door before IETF-114,
> > and that we need a meeting to get that done, that'd be
> > a reason to meet tomorrow. I'm not sure we're there
> > yet though
>
>
> If we got a consensus on padding and/or AEAD, I'd say let's
> do another rev. If not, than I would just keep MRs ready to
> merge and not do a rev yet.
>
> I would also prefer us to not meet, as to avoid any appearance
> of excluding the WG in the decision making process - even if we
> know this is not the intention of meeting up.
>
> Paul