Re: [Openpgp-dt] v5 keys and hardware tokens (issue #63)

Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Fri, 01 April 2022 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DF83A0859 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.316
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (unsupported algorithm ed25519-sha256)" header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=aiONOZ1P; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fifthhorseman.net header.b=x0pLQmcW
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9spcgcIH3k0j for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from che.mayfirst.org (unknown [162.247.75.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B68653A0DF4 for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 14:33:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019; t=1648848786; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=V3ieVHRCq2Ah3DWaJ2l5Ym9sNqssCt8zpUt/JA1SNEo=; b=aiONOZ1PmDd7fqmwNCMxykY8nWPJA42aGUcVgpXIWCGhKPUobf1M0jQugvPLpjLqsLDWi jS0WuB1XBbvdvOKAw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fifthhorseman.net; i=@fifthhorseman.net; q=dns/txt; s=2019rsa; t=1648848786; h=from : to : cc : subject : in-reply-to : references : date : message-id : mime-version : content-type : from; bh=V3ieVHRCq2Ah3DWaJ2l5Ym9sNqssCt8zpUt/JA1SNEo=; b=x0pLQmcWjFVJIjRnSat7a6GhLdIW01HmYnSH2R4wM2EeLvUhPVJyLxB91pf7RDKO15MsU rtXQvjsbk+isobIyrZLCMKCPj9Q0XmkWmz3siCp8YVDfoHI1aRIIMLim54yseih+Dg5f3dU 75ZaP76AU8rRMy55F4tMS9t0nM1UwizkM8sHeZuCxLizcw7PMQlHNqVt+YNNn4eiLbTwAMM L+WLk1Cw/i5lzAkGhFXkRLqHKYimzj3pWlGeBsYej4f8STpyaY2LKBwhYV5Zmgh2xcAog7p oVnev9Rk7uU6yAnDfMLf3DWG6Ps/ZQzhQUOIrgz5KQDHfkVQsDD0MCCugUTQ==
Received: from fifthhorseman.net (lair.fifthhorseman.net [108.58.6.98]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-384) server-digest SHA384) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FEA4F9AD; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:33:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2D7D20374; Fri, 1 Apr 2022 17:33:02 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
To: NIIBE Yutaka <gniibe@fsij.org>
Cc: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <87ilrsn065.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
References: <87sfrqthre.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87ee32ozuh.fsf@jumper.gniibe.org> <87ilrsn065.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
Autocrypt: addr=dkg@fifthhorseman.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEX+i03xYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACA4xvL/xI5dHedcnkfViyq84doe8zFRid9jW7CC9XBiI0QQf FgoAgwWCX+i03wWJBZ+mAAMLCQcJEOCS6zpcoQ26RxQAAAAAAB4AIHNhbHRAbm90YXRpb25zLnNl cXVvaWEtcGdwLm9yZ/tr8E9NA10HvcAVlSxnox6z62KXCInWjZaiBIlgX6O5AxUKCAKbAQIeARYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADZHQD/Zx9nc3N2kj13AUsKMr/7zekBtgfSIGB3hRCU74Su G44A/34Yp6IAkndewLxb1WdRSokycnaCVyrk0nb4imeAYyoPtBc8ZGtnQGZpZnRoaG9yc2VtYW4u bmV0PojRBBMWCgCDBYJf6LTfBYkFn6YAAwsJBwkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3Rh dGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnL0Gwxvypz2tu1IPG+yu1zPjkiZwpscsitwrVvzN3bbADFQoI ApsBAh4BFiEEwp+KDAHzXjTYFqpc4JLrOlyhDboAAPkXAP0Z29z7jW+YzLzPTQML4EQLMbkHOfU4 +s+ki81Czt0WqgD/SJ8RyrqDCtEP8+E4ZSR01ysKqh+MUAsTaJlzZjehiQ24MwRf6LTfFgkrBgEE AdpHDwEBB0DkKHOW2kmqfAK461+acQ49gc2Z6VoXMChRqobGP0ubb4kBiAQYFgoBOgWCX+i03wWJ BZ+mAAkQ4JLrOlyhDbpHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3Jnfvo+ nHoxDwaLaJD8XZuXiaqBNZtIGXIypF1udBBRoc0CmwICHgG+oAQZFgoAbwWCX+i03wkQPp1xc3He VlxHFAAAAAAAHgAgc2FsdEBub3RhdGlvbnMuc2VxdW9pYS1wZ3Aub3JnaheiqE7Pfi3Atb3GGTw+ jFcBGOaobgzEJrhEuFpXREEWIQQttUkcnfDcj0MoY88+nXFzcd5WXAAAvrsBAIJ5sBg8Udocv25N stN/zWOiYpnjjvOjVMLH4fV3pWE1AP9T6hzHz7hRnAA8d01vqoxOlQ3O6cb/kFYAjqx3oMXSBhYh BMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AADX7gD/b83VObe14xrNP8xcltRrBZF5OE1rQSPkMNy+eWpk eCwA/1hxiS8ZxL5/elNjXiWuHXEvUGnRoVj745Vl48sZPVYMuDgEX+i03xIKKwYBBAGXVQEFAQEH QIGex1WZbH6xhUBve5mblScGYU+Y8QJOomXH+rr5tMsMAwEICYjJBBgWCgB7BYJf6LTfBYkFn6YA CRDgkus6XKENukcUAAAAAAAeACBzYWx0QG5vdGF0aW9ucy5zZXF1b2lhLXBncC5vcmcEAx9vTD3b J0SXkhvcRcCr6uIDJwic3KFKxkH1m4QW0QKbDAIeARYhBMKfigwB81402BaqXOCS6zpcoQ26AAAX mwD8CWmukxwskU82RZLMk5fm1wCgMB5z8dA50KLw3rgsCykBAKg1w/Y7XpBS3SlXEegIg1K1e6dR fRxL7Z37WZXoH8AH
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 17:33:01 -0400
Message-ID: <87czi0mquq.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/X9jESoaypgffnbG75287narh06Q>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] v5 keys and hardware tokens (issue #63)
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 21:34:07 -0000

On Fri 2022-04-01 14:11:46 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Thanks, this makes sense.  I'm inclined to try to write up a bit of
> text, as guidance for implementers dealing with hardware constrained
> such that it can't transport v5 fingerprints.
>
> I was thinking of making it a subsection of the "Implementation Nits"
> section.

I've just pushed
https://gitlab.com/openpgp-wg/rfc4880bis/-/merge_requests/160 which
offers a sort of variant of my earlier (d) proposal.

I'd appreciate it if anyone who deals with smartcards or other hardware
tokens could take a look and see whether it makes sense.

Feedback welcome (or if it's terrible, please feel free to just rewrite
the proposal from the ground up, i won't complain)

       --dkg