Re: [Openpgp-dt] Resurrecting the design team?

Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 15 September 2022 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD29C157B36 for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:37:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k4Ev_qVgTH4P for <openpgp-dt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:37:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3FAEC157B32 for <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 09:37:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4MT2tK1XrtzCnc; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:37:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1663259849; bh=2c3TY7VNs86/b/JkvZlziWV3OezvC3AePjzBh0S6KAk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=eZyNQ/BeOl3MQV8O/RMEXlmL/laPuk5qPAAycfrA3G/XYKMbTKihF39J5CVtYAFeI ElsXy1MC4/C7Noq30PsuEKuMFMayUS9t6WBWRCu52uYExF4PzorqUoqOybTdbpHako pwKsK+FZ1NZ2o8mST4HGPRPdcV9tIrrqBSBwavlw=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t9qqO6XnLIW6; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:37:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [193.110.157.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 18:37:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E0B43C96BB; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:37:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0343C96BA; Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:37:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 12:37:27 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Daniel Huigens <d.huigens=40protonmail.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "openpgp-dt@ietf.org" <openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <kmG4ljo5UX7pxlqL3rLQJfi1-kY_usIv8FNPtC4Q6HJtPgng5P4VvLaVnOyPPd6WPdVKBQOKMdH2JX1wAIXlywZXK9KVFj5egVpSavorSnw=@protonmail.com>
Message-ID: <9d1c4b68-b332-386e-1c7-7fec668bc54@nohats.ca>
References: <kmG4ljo5UX7pxlqL3rLQJfi1-kY_usIv8FNPtC4Q6HJtPgng5P4VvLaVnOyPPd6WPdVKBQOKMdH2JX1wAIXlywZXK9KVFj5egVpSavorSnw=@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp-dt/mCd_AaAzLbGocDJEj8dqMnjML48>
Subject: Re: [Openpgp-dt] Resurrecting the design team?
X-BeenThere: openpgp-dt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: OpenPGP working group design team <openpgp-dt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp-dt/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp-dt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp-dt>, <mailto:openpgp-dt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2022 16:37:36 -0000

On Thu, 15 Sep 2022, Daniel Huigens wrote:

> Before IETF 114, we agreed not to meet, and have discussions in the WG
> instead. At IETF 114, I think we came to some clear decisions based on
> the polls that were held, but those decisions haven't been "executed"
> yet, although there are some MRs for them.

I am not aware of pending approved issues. I'm waiting on consensus
calls for some items to be called by the WG chairs.

> There are also some editorial MRs that are already approved, and some
> new items that came up on the WG list after IETF 114 (e.g. the context
> binding / separation) that I think would be good to discuss in the
> design team.

I think we decided that we would talk on the main list on any issues, as
to ensure we are not excluding the WG.

> So - I would propose that we meet a couple of times before IETF 115

If it is editorial, I can pick it up as Editor. Anything bigger should
at least be called out as having concensus by the chairs (or become a
call to the list for consensus)

I have also pinged the chairs last week to move things forward :)

Paul