Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
Levi <levi@teklife.info> Thu, 30 June 2016 03:46 UTC
Return-Path: <levi@teklife.info>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4A412D5C6 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:46:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=teklife.info
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhByBbxHfgLS for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from atropos.hmdnsgroup.com (atropos.hmdnsgroup.com [63.247.142.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A1912D17E for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:46:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=teklife.info; s=default; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Reply-To:In-Reply-To: Message-Id:Date:Subject:To:From:Sender:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:References:List-Id:List-Help: List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=PQigT2pSY2leeFedl7EbnkmVey9xPkBaSG2IxNPE0qg=; b=wFgTiyqjmHBbnUYhWLk0BUPqDS CEwqejiMtZM7tKFuD8iYT31wXV+cb7lmcILGHSgzAL7BF/qyH1/H9EtlHVd8GoYsK7riTYvIjLio5 0aLo7ZxVSGitRb1VqHPKRi6Dm7198mmAV7B1popACvrmpVkk042gOHxn767gcAvhPWBCGEBTE3SJj V0Ti7pZPx287wbTKRj/VTTr7mhvc1vYyGGlr4fFNFKY8Q9064JdPAREYGYjCC09QqYePMunlr4hn+ 07CyCGKkl1vqUeRV4iBJNveWw48FlcEqZerdHAALpn9jv/xAYFlMs/x2RRHJ7mwE6bUA8zC/EAwsX i+hUMZDA==;
Received: from [76.26.84.151] (port=51929 helo=[192.168.1.3]) by atropos.hmdnsgroup.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <levi@teklife.info>) id 1bISvf-0002iT-6c for openpgp@ietf.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2016 23:46:15 -0400
From: Levi <levi@teklife.info>
To: IETF OpenPGP <openpgp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:46:20 +0000
Message-Id: <em96578ad1-5599-4919-bce0-a77eeab7ea65@desktop-6nlaf4c>
In-Reply-To: <878txtjnf6.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.24928.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------=_MB0A533B71-B876-497F-8197-358EE1C42313"
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-ID: 1bISvf-0002iT-6c
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-HMDNSGroup-MailScanner-From: levi@teklife.info
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - atropos.hmdnsgroup.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - teklife.info
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: atropos.hmdnsgroup.com: authenticated_id: levi@teklife.info
X-Authenticated-Sender: atropos.hmdnsgroup.com: levi@teklife.info
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/-d4N8sDAjwwQQo0DzoBECKh7esw>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Levi <levi@teklife.info>
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 03:46:35 -0000
+1 :) ------ Original Message ------ From: "Daniel Kahn Gillmor" <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> To: "IETF OpenPGP" <openpgp@ietf.org> Sent: 6/25/2016 11:30:53 AM Subject: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis >hey OpenPGP folks-- > >We've had a slow start on 4880bis, but i'm hoping we can get things >moving again. One of the things we need to do bureaucratically is to >officially adopt a specific draft as the basis of our ongoing work. > >Werner Koch has prepared and submitted the beginnings of the new >revision of RFC 4880, the current version of which you can see here: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-koch-openpgp-rfc4880bis-02 > >This is a call for adoption of this draft by the OpenPGP WG. Please >speak up soon if you have any concerns, or if you think this document >should not be adopted by the WG for some reason. Please also speak up >if you are in favor of adoption. > >A brief reminder of what adoption by the WG would mean: > > * this draft would become the *starting point* for RFC 4880bis; the > draft is currently not complete, but it would be the basis upon >which > the group would build the new proposal. > > * Werner Koch would be the document editor, but the decisions about >the > draft would be made by the working group. I want to thank Werner >for > his willingness to put in his time as the document editor. > > * Since our charter (https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/openpgp/charter/) > is aimed primarily at making a revision to RFC 4880, we would > hopefully focus our efforts on contributing review and amendments to > this draft, with a goal of driving it to IETF Last Call within the > year. > >Please give feedback on draft adoption! > > --dkg
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Werner Koch
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Barry Leiba
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… James Cloos
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Dominik Schuermann
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Levi
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… David Shaw
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Bill Frantz
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Paul Wouters
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Barry Leiba
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Jon Callas
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Salz, Rich
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Robert J. Hansen
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Jon Callas
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Jon Callas
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Derek Atkins
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Kristian Fiskerstrand
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Derek Atkins
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Tom Ritter
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Kristian Fiskerstrand
- [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-openpgp… Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [openpgp] call for adoption of draft-koch-ope… Barry Leiba