IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 03 July 2017 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503E131757 for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yjWfduddVJCU for <openpgp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 730CC131756 for <openpgp@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id v63JVxkt005629; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 20:35:42 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=rV057vfwJCTcbAeeL0Oag7lLZe/Gp5FnTHcW2X7CksQ=; b=nMbNsrqpShLmr6opAF/n4W7g6pZ11dhpkZ3w+V7HGy/AYR7KcFpMJ0AWDCoypPJDtjLB itGlTT9NICN7deiOix21XbdztEhyIHqHFptprsqjr2mskP9w2Lf96hYbo3U0eSVgZ+vJ zupXw+EFUOBZBfMqxc6fv1YSS0x5NeQiYHnvQpc4S8Wpb4GLVoSqIFpSn8C/ugpDFIbi 7HvXGA+SDa9hlmgCHEsAPKvivGduj7zQStVTYsz7JXAuOEotW/+EE1kcqqzN199e3frt ZE3r5LU/tRQPEQG1Gy7/gLJ111sIYNV93s0zVJ9vhXygyP+GZ4e/nvwUGonKvhz2GhJE +A==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint1 (a184-51-33-18.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [184.51.33.18] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2be3949rje-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 20:35:42 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v63JUopC007760; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:35:40 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.31]) by prod-mail-ppoint1.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2be72u5b5q-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:35:40 -0400
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.65) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:35:40 -0700
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1263.000; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 15:35:39 -0400
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "Robert J. Hansen" <rjh@sixdemonbag.org>, "openpgp@ietf.org" <openpgp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHS8sWEh9Lc8i/Rkk2/JG/FGnFEUKJBRtOAgAAruwCAAU95AIAAANWA//++Z8A=
Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:35:38 +0000
Message-ID: <679411c5b2de4c308cbfbb3733c4fe54@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <149847732613.7086.8580563657011849337.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJKxWevOZYv1hOBFV-+3T=2x43vmie50t6ko2A+a-gTS_A@mail.gmail.com> <a3a82aab-a0d9-f044-21c0-26de346bf6b3@sixdemonbag.org> <20170702232541.t25v6mf36qnrxkex@genre.crustytoothpaste.net> <1b5da7bf-d43b-fde5-f6b6-28d9c6fd6edb@gmx.net> <94a05934-4b5c-4fb6-d127-beb0eacb47cf@sixdemonbag.org>
In-Reply-To: <94a05934-4b5c-4fb6-d127-beb0eacb47cf@sixdemonbag.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.45.87]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-03_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707030318
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-07-03_13:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1707030318
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/openpgp/-s1fztgeruvRbIsw-AWYVlxTiD8>
Subject: Re: [openpgp] Expiration impending: <draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc4880bis-01.txt>
X-BeenThere: openpgp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Ongoing discussion of OpenPGP issues." <openpgp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/openpgp/>
List-Post: <mailto:openpgp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp>, <mailto:openpgp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 19:35:46 -0000

> > What's your opinion about defining additional (non-ECC) public-key
> > algorithms, e.g., Cramer-Shoup or an IND-CPA secure variant of ElGamal?
> 
> I would be opposed to this.  This is not the time to start adding neat stuff to
> the RFC.  Now is the time to make the critical and necessary changes to the
> RFC and *get it published*.

Strongly agree.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email